Mobile workflow developers request your feedback - please speak up!

[Former Member]

Hello, The mobile development group is looking at some additional ideas for workflow on mobile devices and they have the following questions for you:

Item 1:

If you have to choose only one, what would be more important for you in case of a mobile application for approvals when you launch the application or bring it back from background after half an hour:

A) See the list of work items as fast as possible, so you can immediately try to start working even if some of the items might be out-of-date and there is some chance that you run into an error.

B) See an up-to-date list of work items and wait a bit more (2-4 seconds) for it.

Item 2:

For user decisions in the inbox, like approvals, the question is around rejections. The plan is to not require comments u2013 but there will be an option to approve/reject. After selecting reject (for example) the user will be able to reject or add comments (or cancel). The question is: Is it OK to not force comments on reject, but to make it optional only?

So u2013 please let us know what you think!

Thanks!

Ginger

[former_member3555]

Thank you to everyone who has responded! I will leave the thread open for another week then mark it closed and give everyone points who has resonded. The mobile deveopment team is watching this thread and thank you so much for your participation!!

[suresh_subramanian2]

Hello Ginger Gatling !

My opinion for item 1 is to see an up-to-date list of work items and wait a bit more (2-4 seconds) for it.So that there won't be any need to have a chance to look out-of-date work items and so there is no chance of running into an error.

My opinion for item 2 is to make comment optional.

Regards,

S.Suresh