on ‎2019 Nov 13 11:23 AM
Fellow users,
I have a Story in which I have my data displayed like this:

The dimension used is called "Prodh L1", the first measure is a standard measure from my live BW-connection and the 2nd and 3rd measures are calculated measures based on measures from BW. If I add a second dimension called "Prodh L4" the data is split in several underlying levels. Below is the example of the breakdown for the first dimension:

Now I have created a Excel-file in which I map every "Prodh L4" to a "Prod Segm 1". I created Linked Dimension, looking like this:

Both are matched on "ID". I add this Linked Dimension to my table as a Linked Model. I add the "Prod Segm 1" as a Dimension and my table changes to this:

The mapping has worked correctly and most of the table still looks the same. However: all the 'zero' values - which were presented as a "-" in the previous table - have now been replaced by a diagonal line in the cell, as if SAC says it can't calculate anything there. If I now remove the first two Dimensions and leave only my newly added Dimension "Prod Segm 1" - as this is my goal for this entier exercies - I get this:

Instead of getting the aggregated sums for all the underlying levels, it gives me all 'diagonal lines' (except for the "ACT Gross Sales" column, because this column contains no cells with a 'zero' value). I'm guessing this has something to do with SAC replacing the 'zero' on the underling levels with a 'diagonal line'. Why does SAC do this? Is there something I'm doing wrong or is what I'm trying to achieve impossible due to some reason I'm not aware of?
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Request clarification before answering.
Hi Stefan,
Looks like SAC is not able to calculate the measure values when dimensions are not part of the crosstab. This scenario could well be limited due to the live BW blending. Could you try to do the following: use an import connection to BW to import the data, combine this with the Excel file during model creation, create a crosstab on top of a single model.
With kind regards,
Martijn van Foeken | Interdobs
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Martijn,
thanks once again for thinking with me through this. Sadly, our IT Department has disabled import connections to BW, I can only use live connections and am therefore obliged to use the 'live BW blending'. This has limited me before, but never as significantly as this example. Is there any way to check if this issue is really caused by the 'live BW blending'?
Kind regards,
Stefan van Diepen
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 9 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.