Mobile workflow developers request your feedback - please speak up!

[Former Member]

Hello, The mobile development group is looking at some additional ideas for workflow on mobile devices and they have the following questions for you:

Item 1:

If you have to choose only one, what would be more important for you in case of a mobile application for approvals when you launch the application or bring it back from background after half an hour:

A) See the list of work items as fast as possible, so you can immediately try to start working even if some of the items might be out-of-date and there is some chance that you run into an error.

B) See an up-to-date list of work items and wait a bit more (2-4 seconds) for it.

Item 2:

For user decisions in the inbox, like approvals, the question is around rejections. The plan is to not require comments u2013 but there will be an option to approve/reject. After selecting reject (for example) the user will be able to reject or add comments (or cancel). The question is: Is it OK to not force comments on reject, but to make it optional only?

So u2013 please let us know what you think!

Thanks!

Ginger

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hello,

I haven't used workflow on mobile devices but here's my opinion anyway:

Item 1:

B) See an up-to-date list of work items and wait a bit more (2-4 seconds) for it.

Item 2:

Comments optional.

regards

Rick Bakker

hanabi technology

[former_member3555 · Accepted solution]

Thank you, Rick!