2007 May 23 12:23 PM
Hi all,
What is the difference between FTP_R3_TO_SERVER and FTP_COMMAND function modules.
Regards,
VR.
Message was edited by:
VR IT
2007 May 23 12:46 PM
Hi
The FTP_R3_TO_SERVER is nice because it takes data directly from memory and performs an FTP on it. However it is a little limited in options as you found.
If you don't mind writting your file to your local filesystem first, you can always use the function modules FTP_CONNECT, FTP_COMMAND, and FTP_DISCONNECT. You can string together muliptle calls to FTP_COMMAND to issue all sorts of things. You can use puts, appends, or just about anything you can execute from a FTP command line interface.
For further more info try below link
Regards
Hi
The FTP_R3_TO_SERVER is nice because it takes data directly from memory and performs an FTP on it. However it is a little limited in options as you found.
If you don't mind writting your file to your local filesystem first, you can always use the function modules FTP_CONNECT, FTP_COMMAND, and FTP_DISCONNECT. You can string together muliptle calls to FTP_COMMAND to issue all sorts of things. You can use puts, appends, or just about anything you can execute from a FTP command line interface.
For further more info try below link
Regards
2007 May 23 12:46 PM
Hi
The FTP_R3_TO_SERVER is nice because it takes data directly from memory and performs an FTP on it. However it is a little limited in options as you found.
If you don't mind writting your file to your local filesystem first, you can always use the function modules FTP_CONNECT, FTP_COMMAND, and FTP_DISCONNECT. You can string together muliptle calls to FTP_COMMAND to issue all sorts of things. You can use puts, appends, or just about anything you can execute from a FTP command line interface.
For further more info try below link
Regards
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 6 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |