cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Subscribe

Hi All,

We are on GRC 10.0 SP09.

While uploading ruleset, in Function Permissions file we have searchtype AND at some places is taken as OR by the system.

We understand that if searchtype is blank, system consider's it as AND and if there is no object values mentioned also system takes it as AND.

But when we mention it as AND at some places, Error is we have system taking it as OR.

Please help what would be the possible solution, how system considers the permission conditions.

Regards,

Sravan

0 Likes
View Entire Topic
FilipGRC
Contributor
0 Likes

Sravan,

a search operator type may act differently depending on case – below I described possibile ways:

    • Values defined in range (value from, value  to) are linked automatically by the operator OR
    • Different fields of a one authorization object are linked automatically by the search operator AND
    • If the same authorization field types (for example activates 01 and 03) are combined, the search operator decides how the fileds are linked together
    • It is recommended that you use search operator not in HR area only! 

Let me know if you need more information,

Filip

Former Member
0 Likes

Hi Filip,

Thanks for your reply.

for the third point

If the same authorization field types (for example activates 01 and 03) are combined, the search operator decides how the fileds are linked together

Query-

If we define ACTVT 01 and 03 for same object and searchtype as and/or will operator consider it as what ever defined?

or what value operator takes by default if we maintain searchtype blank in the file we upload in all the scenarios.

Thanks in advance for your inputs.

Regards,

Sravan