cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

XI, SLD & multiple clients for DEV & QA

Former Member
0 Likes
304

<i>Ref: </i>

I have a question regarding the avoidance of duplicated Configuration (Collaboration Profiles, Logical Routing & Collaboration Agreements) for different clients in the DEV/QA landscape.

As we know: many projects have multiple clients in DEV and QA. Here is an example landscape:

SXD_100 - Dev XI server

SED_100 - config dev

SED_200 - ABAP dev

SED_300 - unit test

SED_400 - sandbox

<b>[ 1 technical system : 3 business systems ! ]</b>

LDEV Legacy system

<b>[ 1 technical system : 1 business system ]</b>

SXQ_100 - QA XI server

SEQ_100 - clean config QA

SEQ_200 - ABAP QA

SEQ_300 - data migration prep

SEQ_nnn - yada, yada...

<b>[ 1 technical system : nnn business systems ! ]</b>

LQA Legacy system

<b>[ 1 technical system : 1 business system ]</b>

<b>The problem:</b>

SED_400->LDEV is used for prototyping integration

SED_100->LDEV is used for config development

SED_200->LDEV is used for ABAP development

SED_300->LDEV is used for unit tests

Receiver Determination is able to look into the message for a <b>dynamic receiver</b>, but we are not able to have a <b>sender</b> like "SED*"

<b>The question:</b>

Do we really need multiple sets of configuration in the Integration Directory? Is there a way to re-use the configuration for SED_100->LDEV for the other development efforts?

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Rgds,

Derek

View Entire Topic
Former Member
0 Likes

Derek,

In my view I don't think its possible. Each of the clients of SAP system is a different technical system as well as corresponds to a different business system.

You have written that your entire DEV landscape is one technical system, which actually is not as each of these clients is configured indivually in the SLD.

So from an SLD / XI stand point each client is a business application.

I don't think we have work around as we are dealing with different systems.

Regards,

Ravi.

Note : please reward points if you find the answer useful.