on ‎2013 Sep 07 3:18 AM
Hi Mates,
We have are facing one strange issue in our production system we just fed up, i need all your valuable support in resolving this issue, Hope i will succeeded in this.
Scenario:
There is delta DTP which is part of daily process chain which will load the data from DSO(standard) to Cube as usual in the transformation level their is some business logic is written both in the start & end routine but this DTP will approximately 1.5 million records for this it will take
approx 10-14 hrs runtime,so after analysis we have found code which is written in the start routine is not optimized so we have done some minor changes in the code to improve the load performance.
But issue started from here onward we have done changes on development and transported to quality we have ran same DTP which is their in the production it's performance has improved drastically for 1.7 million records it took only 15 mins runtime so we felt very happy and on the same day we have transported code to production but big magic has happened here only.
when that particular DTP has ran in the production through schedule process chain it running for long time like for one data package(50000) to complete it is taking 3-4 hours so to pull all 1.5 million records it is running for 2 days due to this long run it has impacted entire production system means other loads.
So my doubt here is why it is take acting strange in the production, Please give your valuable reviews on my issue.
Below is the piece of code which is there is in the start routine
DATA : s_material TYPE /bi0/pmaterial ,
t_material LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF s_material,
wa_material LIKE LINE OF t_material,
s_matunit TYPE /bi0/pmat_unit,
t_matunit LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF s_matunit,
wa_matunit LIKE LINE OF t_matunit.
DATA : s_primrate TYPE /bic/azsd_o01900,
t_primrate LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF s_primrate,
wa_primrate LIKE LINE OF t_primrate,
min_calday LIKE sy-datum.
DATA : BEGIN OF r_compcode OCCURS 100,
sign TYPE c LENGTH 1,
option TYPE c LENGTH 2,
low TYPE c LENGTH 4,
high TYPE c LENGTH 4,
END OF r_compcode.
data : s_/BI0/PCOMP_CODE type /BI0/PCOMP_CODE ,
t_/BI0/PCOMP_CODE like STANDARD TABLE OF s_/BI0/PCOMP_CODE,
wa_/BI0/PCOMP_CODE LIKE LINE OF t_/BI0/PCOMP_CODE.
data wa_r_compcode like LINE OF r_compcode.
CLASS lcl_transform IMPLEMENTATION.
METHOD start_routine.
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
<SOURCE_FIELDS> TYPE _ty_s_SC_1.
DATA: MONITOR_REC TYPE rstmonitor.
min_calday = sy-datum - 30.
if SOURCE_PACKAGE is NOT INITIAL.
SELECT *
INTO TABLE t_material
FROM /bi0/pmaterial
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN SOURCE_PACKAGE
WHERE material eq SOURCE_PACKAGE-material
and objvers EQ 'A'.
SELECT *
INTO TABLE t_matunit
FROM /bi0/pmat_unit
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN SOURCE_PACKAGE
WHERE material eq SOURCE_PACKAGE-material
and objvers EQ 'A'.
endif.
select *
into table T_/BI0/PCOMP_CODE
from /BI0/PCOMP_CODE
where COUNTRY eq 'PK'
and OBJVERS eq 'A'.
loop at t_/BI0/PCOMP_CODE into wa_/BI0/PCOMP_CODE.
wa_r_compcode-sign = 'I'.
wa_r_compcode-option = 'EQ'.
wa_r_compcode-low = wa_/BI0/PCOMP_CODE-COMP_CODE.
wa_r_compcode-high = ''.
append wa_r_compcode to r_compcode.
endloop.
IF SOURCE_PACKAGE[] IS NOT INITIAL.
REFRESH: t_primrate.
DELETE SOURCE_PACKAGE[] WHERE comp_code NOT IN r_compcode.
SELECT *
INTO TABLE t_primrate
FROM /bic/azsd_o01900
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN SOURCE_PACKAGE
WHERE salesorg EQ SOURCE_PACKAGE-salesorg
and comp_code EQ SOURCE_PACKAGE-comp_code
and division EQ SOURCE_PACKAGE-division
and distr_chan EQ SOURCE_PACKAGE-distr_chan
and calday GT min_calday
and customer EQ SOURCE_PACKAGE-/bic/zsd_dist
and material EQ SOURCE_PACKAGE-material.
ENDIF.
SORT t_material BY material objvers.
SORT t_matunit BY material mat_unit objvers.
SORT t_primrate BY salesorg comp_code division
distr_chan calday customer material.
ENDMETHOD.
METHOD inverse_start_routine.
ENDMETHOD.
ENDCLASS.
Please free to ask me if you have any doubts regarding my issue.
Regards,
Harish
Request clarification before answering.
Hi,
Their is lot of scope of improvement in you code i feel..Even though i am not an expert in ABAP but still can give you few pointers.
Instead of select * use select with the field name you need to select.Because select * picks all the fields from that particular table.
It would be good choice if you define your own structure with the required fields rather than accessing the complete table fields.
You can also check this out:Might be helpful and useful in improving performance of the code.
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-45849
Regards,
AL
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Anshu,
Thanks for your quick reply we are aware of their is so much scope to optimize my code but my question here is it is working fine in quality system why it is acting so strange when comes to production.
for your information we have checked version management and all those stuff but they are fine.
and even we have also checked in the source DSO is their any NULL or duplicate values are their but their is no as such entries.
Note: Source DSO(standard) and the lookup which i am doing is ZSD_O019 it is direct update DSO.
with my limited knowledge i am asking all you experts is their any DB level indexes inconsistency happened.......!!!! because we are suspecting that is their any chances due this we are facing this strange behavior in the production.
**i have already checked the link which you have shared and i asked my ABAP team to look into it but they told it doesn't make much sense by using DB join concepts and even it is not relevant to our scenario.
Please assist me how to resolve this.
Regards,
Harish
Hi,
Production system is pretty different than other system and lot of time it happens the things which run fine on DEV and QA may not work on PRD.
I would suggest to run the load when the access to the server is minimum may be in the late evening and also make sure no load is happening that time and see if that makes some difference.
As you are guessing that it might be the cause with indexing then in RSRV you may do complete check of those objects.
Another thing as pointed out by Bose--check which process is taking longer time.
Hope this gives you some clue to move ahead.
Regards,
AL
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 9 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.