Hello all,
I am not sure if this is the right forum for my issue but i will give it a try. Here is my situtation:
we recently refreshed our SDX sandbox apo system from DEV. No other systems in the group were refreshed , target systems or others were not refreshed in parallel. As a post refresh step, just like in BW, I had to go to RSA1> right click on the source sytem (pointing to old logical name DEVBI)> and then restore. So now, the new Sources sytem for SCM is supposed to be Sandbox BI (SBI) which is fine ,and the source system connection is also working good. But when we perform search for SBI datasources in RSA1 .it display 2 entries for the same datasource..one with SBI source system (which is correct) and another one with old source sytem (DBI, which is incorrect).. So we see the duplicate entries for the same datasource with 2 logical system names (old+new). Also, we are unable to replicate datasources for the SBI source system, it says DBI source sytem does not exist. I am not sure why this DBI source system's logical still there. Can anyone please share if they have ran into similiar issues? if so How can i get rid of this old logcial names from RSA1 from datasources ,that is DBI.
BTW, RABASIDOC and RSLOGSYSDEST table entries are showing correctly. Again, BW is the source system here.
Thanks,
Request clarification before answering.
Hi,
Cross check in RSLOGSYSMAP table in both BW and R/3 systems.......
Regards,
Suman
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello ,
I just noticed that in RSBASIDOC table of newly refreshed system (not the source system), the TSPREFIX field does not match with the Source's system's TSPRFIX field, and it is has the value of DEV System (source of refresh). Could this be the issue ?
How can I change the value of this field ? any suggestions please?
Hi Tyler ,
Yes we got this resolved with the help of SAP support. As per them , for some reason BDLS did not convert all tables, which is still the mystery. So we were suggested to open another message for Basis component (BC*) to find out the root cause why BDLS did not funtion properly. Thanks everyoone for your time and responses.
DK
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.