cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Parallel Support Package Upgrades

david_zepeda
Explorer
0 Likes
1,566

Dear Experts,

We are in the early planning stages for applying support packages to our two SAP environments: once that is ECC / FICO, and the second which is Business Warehouse and BPC. Generally speaking we following an N-1 strategy to identify target packages from current early watch reports.

From a schedule perspective, we were aiming to apply support packages into each environment on a parallel schedule (Dev environments upgraded on same date, QA on same date, and production on the same date). There are concerns being raised that this strategy carries to much risk with it. I am looking for feedback either confirming the use of this strategy or affirming that risk would be too great.

As always, thanks for your contribution.

DZ

View Entire Topic
Former Member
0 Likes

Hi David,

My largest concern, which doesn't seem to be accounted for here, is testing and the ability to reproduce the process accurately and with minimal mistakes.

If you perform the upgrade simultaneously on all 3 systems, where is your testing occurring?  With support packs comes changes to current SAP code that can (and will) introduce it's own set of bugs.  We've seen bugs introduced in support packs that literally break come core functionality.  You have to do regression testing to identify these somewhere.  If you have an N+1 landscape, this would alleviate that, somewhat.

The second concern would be nailing down the process of actually performing the upgrade.  You'll normally perform a first upgrade in a Sandbox or Development system, and create a cookbook, detailing the steps, error handling, etc. of what you just went through.  Then in each system that doc gets modified, so that (in theory) by the time you hit production, you'll be ready for anything that gets thrown at you.  This becomes especially important using SUM, as opposed to SPAM. 

I'd be very careful, and very leery of performing the upgrade in all 3 simultaneously.


Hope this helps,

MM

david_zepeda
Explorer
0 Likes

Matt,

Thanks very much for your feedback. Some additional information about the support package upgrade plans.

There are two systems involved here: one that contains FICO, and the second that has both BW and BPC. The respective Dev environments won't be upgraded at the exact same time. However when we get to the QA environments, we are planning to do both at the same time, including the full slate of regression testing. The QA environments will be open for testing 5 weeks before we apply support packs to production, again at the same time.

I'm not sure if any of that information changes the degree of risk you foresee relative to an effort like this?

Thanks,

DZ

Former Member
0 Likes

Hi David,

Perhaps I was not understanding correctly.

Are you asking if there's a risk of simply doing BPC at the same time as ERP?

-or-

Performing DEV, QA, and Production all at the same time? 

It sounded, up at the top, that you were considering doing DEV, QA, and Production (of both systems) all on the same day.  That's what alarmed me, as it didn't seem like there was any regression testing (which would be horribly painful and a large risk, depending on the size of the stack).

We generally like to do our standalone Netweaver stacks concurrently with our ERP stacks, but that remains a somewhat personal preference, and a source of debate.  As in, if we do ERP EHP7 stack 11, we'll find the corresponding Netweaver stack, and perform that on our portals, BW, etc. all at the same time.  In my humble opinion, this minimizes risk simply because everything then has the same core stack below it. 

It's a lot of information, and I hope this makes sense.

MM

yakcinar
Active Contributor
0 Likes

Hello Mathew,

I understood from David's first message is that simultaneous upgrade is between ERP and BW-BPC.

Not all dev-test-prod at the same date.

He tells "(Dev environments upgraded on same date, QA on same date, and production on the same date)".

Regards,

Yuksel AKCINAR

david_zepeda
Explorer
0 Likes

Matt,

My apologies for the confusion. My query is correctly categorized as being the first item you mention (simply doing BPC at the same time as ERP). We won't be trying to do all of this this in the same day or weekend. Quite to the contrary, we have the entire upgrade event, end to end, stretched out over a couple of months time.

Thanks,

DZ

Former Member
0 Likes

That was my fault for misunderstanding, hence why I was so worried.

So yes, I actually prefer to do the standalone with the ERP stacks, the risks are simply in the timing and testing.  You'll need to make sure that regression testing covers both, and that the integrations are thoroughly tested.

Thanks so much,

MM