Dears,
will this new in-memory technology reduce the need of a relational database?
There are also rumors about a column-based database... are we talking about the same product?
Thanks,
Federico Biavati
Request clarification before answering.
i don't think we can call in-memory a product. for now, it's an idea or a concept which starts at the lowest or the most fundamental layer of the architecture - data base. logic and presentation will follow.
in my mind, we don't need ERs and are throwing away 30+ years of primary/foreign key coding.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.