Dear all,
After four Oracle 10 upgrades, the only remaining warning I have on db13 in all databases I upgraded is about "checkpoint not complete" . This only happens when there is a lot of activity in the database . It never happened before though, even when there was a lot of activity in the database.
I found note #79341 and #1068186 and I have set DISABLESELFTUNE_CHECKPOINTING
to FALSE, but this didn't particularly help, still get the warnings
My questions are:
The log buffer size is increased by the upgrade to 14M (instead of 1M that is used to be). I have 2 groups of redo log files, with 2 files each. Each file is 20M on size.
I was thinking of increasing them to 30M each. Do you think that this is a good thing to do?
Under /oracle/SID/saptrace/background, I see in the log writer trace the messages below. Do you know why I get these messages and are they relevant to the issue I have with the checkpoint?
SERVICE NAME:() 2007-08-09 09:56:38.059
SESSION ID:(316.1) 2007-08-09 09:56:38.059
Maximum redo generation record size = 197120 bytes
Maximum redo generation change vector size = 190204 bytes
tkcrrsarc: (WARN) Failed to find ARCH for message (message:0x10)
tkcrrpa: (WARN) Failed initial attempt to send ARCH message (message:0x10)
2007-08-09 12:55:29.062
LGWR: Archivelog for thread 1 sequence 3662 will NOT be compressed
2007-08-09 14:56:22.902
LGWR: Archivelog for thread 1 sequence 3663 will NOT be compressed
2007-08-09 15:09:29.136
LGWR: Archivelog for thread 1 sequence 3664 will NOT be compressed
2007-08-09 18:25:38.287
Many thanks
Andreas
Request clarification before answering.
Dear Team,
A Checkpoint is a database event which synchronizes the modified data blocks in memory with the datafiles on disk.
Checkpoint not complete indicates that Oracle wants to reuse a redo log file, but
the current checkpoint position is still in that log. In this case, Oracle must
wait until the checkpoint position passes that log
this situation may be encountered if DBWR writes too slowly, or if a log switch happens before the log is completely full, or if log file sizes are too small.
I would even recommend sizing them a few hundred Mbytes, you can also consider adding an extra group because the checkpoint of the log about to be overwritten is not yet complete.
Vinod
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.