Dear Experts,
I belong to construction industry that deals in large scale projects. It is a common practice in business that the scope of work reduces as per actual work done.
We have PO in system with original scope of work and reductions to scope are treated through purchase requisitions with negative nature (a separate document type). Each PR/PO is assigned to a WBS and results in commitment to the project, however, the negative variations PR is also having the same effect as any PR i.e. increasing the commitment where as according to the definition provided above, it should reduce the commitment.
Far as I know, commitments created through PR/PO can only be reduced by short closing the line items but my requirement is to manually reduce the commitment on WBS. I'd like to know if that's possible at all in standard/customized SAP to post "negative" commitment?
Request clarification before answering.
Deleting the PO/PR line or short closing it will reduce your commitment. Adding a PR line, assuming the system will treat it as negative is absurd, how will it know this is a negative PR?
Negative PR makes no sense business-wise either. Why does the client does not want to modify the PO/PR?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
It makes sense for the same reason mentioned earlier that the scope of work needs to be reduced. However, keeping the original PO price and tracking the variations is a complicated process. It is also required to print variation related documents, have them released through system and to keep track of every stage of a contract. For these reasons, changing/reducing the PR will not help.
My question remains, "I'd like to know if that's possible at all in standard/customized SAP to post "negative" commitment?"
hi,
Please check the below link, might be helpful.
Return Purchase Order-Negative delivery costs n... | SCN
I am no MM expert, but following option can be checked. If the qty received is less than the qty in the PO and no further receipts are expected. you can check the check box 'Delivery completed'. this will show the PO as closed and also not show up the additional qty as commitments.
Please check and let know if it works.
Ideally creating another set of PO's to negate the commitment is additional burden to the process and we should try to reduce the number of steps just to make the process easy.
thanks
Hi mos lan
It is indeed a burden that we are carrying trying to utilize standard SAP system for specialized construction industry needs. First, a returns PO for services - have my own doubts about being able to return a service to vendor. Second, the delivery complete indicator is an option only at the end of contract/work where as I want to reduce the commitment any time during the work. Can't wait till the end of projects because of their lengthy duration.
Here is my understanding of the engineering and construction industry (having implemented in one myself):
1) Scope of work is defined before start of project and accordingly PR is raised.
2) PR is converted to PO. This causes a commitment in the WBS.
3) The scope may have to expanded (in most cases)/ or reduced (in your case) based on how the project progresses.
4) The PO is modified accordingly. For example, in the case of expansion, if you do not modify the PO, you cannot receive additional goods/ services in SAP.
This will automatically reduce the commitment in WBS.
The simple logic is this: If you want to show a reduced commitment somehow, you will have to modify/close the PO. You cannot have an open PO and no commitment at the same time.
If this can be confirmed only at the end of the project, then you will need to wait till the end of the project to reduce the commitment. That is my read, and is how standard SAP PS-MM integration will behave.
Check this help.sap link for reducing commitments manually (i'm not a PS expert, not sure if this will work):
Reducing Funds Commitments - Manual Actual Postings (CO-OM-CCA) - SAP Library
Hi Manosij,
Your understanding of E&C industry is correct and I guess you were lucky not to come across the scenario that I am dealing with. It is not simple logic and which is exactly the reason why I am here. The link that you provided is related to funds management and doesn't help with purchasing commitments.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 14 | |
| 13 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.