Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
I am calling a standard function that update some tables and at the end execute a commit work without the wait clause, but right after the execution of the standard function I need to perform some operations that needs all the tables to be updated, so unfortunatelly I needed commit work and wait inside the standard function.
As I cannot change the standard function I tried to use table VBHDR to check when the update process finish but I noticed in my system this table is not trustfull as there are lots of garbage there with field VBRC = 1.
So my question is how can I wait for the commit work to finish in this situation?
Because the standard function already executed the commit work command, so the process was already sent to update, it will make no difference if I call again commit work and wait.
I am not sure about what you suggested but If you said to wrap up my logic in a function and call it in update task it will not work because I will still need to wait for the first commit work to finish.
And also I cannot call it in update task because I need to return the error messages to XI (PI) and that cannot be done in update task.
Because the standard function already executed the commit work command, so the process was already sent to update, it will make no difference if I call again commit work and wait.
Because the standard function already executed the commit work command, so the process was already sent to update, it will make no difference if I call again commit work and wait.
Bluesky
