2007 Sep 21 6:22 PM
Hi,
In select statement, the where conditions could use 'IN select-range', while compare to IN (XX,FF,GG)/NOT IN((XX,FF,GG)), which is better on performance?
Thanks!
Better performance is IN and if you use not in then you could get bad performance than in operator
Thanks
Seshu
2007 Sep 21 6:26 PM
Better performance is IN and if you use not in then you could get bad performance than in operator
Thanks
Seshu
2007 Sep 21 7:04 PM
NOT will cause the database to do a full table scan. Imagine if you want to find a word in the dictionary and all you know is that the word is not "shoe".
It'd take a while.
Rob
2007 Sep 21 10:48 PM
2007 Sep 23 7:12 AM
Hi Edgar
remember one point when your writing where condition
don't use negative conditions in the where condition like NOT etc..
Selection Criteria
reward if usefull
2007 Oct 03 12:23 PM
as far as optimization is concerned IN is better dan NOT IN ..
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 6 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |