SE37 and test function module

[Former Member]

I have an importing parameter in function module interface, type BEGDA (type DATUM), default value SY-DATUM.

When I execute test function module via SE37 and F8, the default value gets value "02....20.3" instead of 03.02.2012 as set up in SU01 for my user.

What can be wrong?

[Former Member]

Hi,

Then try with conversions.

Regards,

Madhu.

[Former Member]

Hi ,

Can you please tell me the FM you are using ??.

Thanks,

Pradeep.

[Harsh_Bansal]

Hi,

Please check the user profile once again.

I checked in my system. User profile has DD.MM.YYYY

In SE37->F8, it shows 06.03.2012 only.

Regards,

Harsh Bansal

[madhu_vadlamani]

Hi ,

You just enter ddmmyyy format that and run.

Regards,

Madhu.

[Former Member]

it is a custom function module Z*. I created the same function module on another system and during test in F8 date is displayed correctly.

I cannot put there date in internal format YYYYMMDD because in test mode user has to put external date format defined in user settings.

[madhu_vadlamani]

Hi,

Then try with conversions.

Regards,

Madhu.

[Former Member]

type DATUM has built in conversion.

It is a pure problem with SE37 and test mode, so if do not read with understanding the problem, please do not answer obvoius things.

[Former Member]

At the risk of also incurring your scorn, let me add that I cannot make this fail, using exactly what you have in the original post. Obviously, something unusual is happening this client/instance, or in code that is manipulating the incoming date value.... my dd.mm.yyyy input defaulted to sy-datum shows 20120306 in begda duringe execution (in debug). Without being able to debug the mentioned FM at every step, it would be hard to pinpoint a specific problem.

[Former Member]

Hi,

Please check the date format in user profile.

Regards,

Gaurav.

[jitendra_it]

Hi Wojciech,

Have you logged out & logged in again after changing the User profile ???

Many Thanks,

Jitendra

[Former Member]

thanks for responses, problem is solved by note

Note 1580525 - Testing in SE37: Problem with initial parameter values