2008 Feb 25 5:54 PM
All ,
What is the impact for manually added authorization objects in the roles after the system upgrade??
Hi,
the reference comes from the values maintained in SU24. So if you maintain SU24 and assign the self created object to a transaction, you will have this reference then visible in pfcg too. An upgrade will not delete own created objects (naming convention has to be recognized, Z***** is preferable as object name).
b.rgds, Bernhard
2008 Feb 25 7:01 PM
My 2 cents, since I don't see any replies.
I try to avoid manual auth objects on a role as much as possible. One problem with manually auth object is in PFCG, it will not give a reference to what transaction the auth object came from. Unless thoroughly documented this can be an audit issue.
In regards to upgrades, I don't this it will have any affect. It is usually the tcodes that are affected.
2008 Feb 26 3:42 PM
Hi,
the reference comes from the values maintained in SU24. So if you maintain SU24 and assign the self created object to a transaction, you will have this reference then visible in pfcg too. An upgrade will not delete own created objects (naming convention has to be recognized, Z***** is preferable as object name).
b.rgds, Bernhard
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 6 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |