2007 Nov 30 3:34 AM
Hi,
I have one issue while implementing few OSS Notes.
I am trying to implement OSS Notes 724112, 743080, 779929 .. etc.
When i am trying to implement above oss notes it is throwing me a window which says: <b>Load the following SAP Notes into your system:</b> <b>355201</b>.
But when i am pressing Download Notes[F8] button it is giving message '<b>Requested OSS Notes downloaded</b>', But the window reappears i am not able proceed further to implement main OSS Note(s).
Note: This OSS Note-355201 is not a dependent note any of above main OSS Notes which are having this problem, Also in Solution/Prereuisites part of all of above OSS Notes there is no reference to OSS Note-355201.
We are not able to find why this Window reappears every time when we are trying to proceed further.
Can anybody solve this issue!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.
2007 Nov 30 11:35 AM
Hi All,
Can anybody give the resolution for the below mention issue!
Any imputs for solving this problem will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.
2007 Nov 30 11:42 AM
Hi..
Just make a try to upload 355201 first n den the remaining...
2007 Nov 30 5:06 PM
Hi,
I tried this. But same thing gets repeated. Thanks for your inputs.
Any other inputs in this regard will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Deep.
2007 Dec 01 4:05 AM
2007 Dec 03 8:02 AM
Hi All,
Anybody has the solution for the above mentgioned issue!
It is stopping us implementing main OSS Note.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.
2008 Jan 30 8:34 PM
Has this issue been fixed? What was the solution? The OSS Note could have already been applied and re-set to original.
2013 Nov 27 10:58 AM
Hi Deep,
Can you please let me know how the issue has been resolved. I'm facing the same issue.
Regards,
Sam
2015 Mar 25 7:39 PM
Hi Sam,
Set a break on SCWB_CINST_READ function, in one of the selects cwbcihead table (Header date for correction instructions), you can see will that not find the correction statement.
In case the statement is a note from a previous version,it´s not possible to insert the statement in the table manually, because for some reason had an inconsistency and the statement was not inserted in the table.
Best regards,
Luiz Ferreira