Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

IDOC - Object filter setting

Former Member
0 Likes
1,285

Dear all,

when i use object filter in IDoc deployment, i find a special part in BD64. Normally just some fields in a filter group but sometimes a special part called 'Dependent on class membership' in it. It seems like a table but i don't know any details. Please give me a guidance.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
993

Hi,

For Idoc filter objects, use transactions BD95 as well as BD59.

~Bineah.

6 REPLIES 6
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
993

Hi,

You can check with transaction BD95 .

Thanks,

Asit Purbey.

Read only

0 Likes
993

Hi, thanks and still some puzzles. Normally I can config some fields in BD59 and when create a filter group in BD64 these fields will be shown one by one. But sometimes at last line a special part 'dependent on class membership' will be displayed, this logon seems like a table. I mean how to control this portion in BD59? Thanks.

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
994

Hi,

For Idoc filter objects, use transactions BD95 as well as BD59.

~Bineah.

Read only

0 Likes
993

Hi, thanks and still some puzzles. Normally I can config some fields in BD59 and when create a filter group in BD64 these fields will be shown one by one. But sometimes at last line a special part 'dependent on class membership' will be displayed, this logon seems like a table. I mean how to control this portion in BD59? Thanks.

Read only

0 Likes
993

Hao,

Could you pls eloberate on whats the Message Type and what filter group did you try to set?

Looks like problem is unique in this case.

Regards

Shital

Read only

0 Likes
993

Hi,

I try to find more details about this case but can not paste screenshot in here, so can you give me your email address for further discussion? Thanks a lot.