​How to replace SELECT ... For all entries statement in the below code in ECC.

[anuja_s]

SELECT deliv_numb deliv_item doc_number s_ord_item /bic/zsdkonnr /bic/zsdkonit
act_gi_dte material sales_unit base_uom doc_currcy
dlv_qty /bic/zdlvqty /bic/zdlvval item_del
* &0001 > F5645557 CHG0015956
ship_date
* &0001 > F5645557 CHG0015956
FROM (l_tabname)
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE l_t_deliveries
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN l_t_deliveries_keys
WHERE doc_number = l_t_deliveries_keys-doc_number
AND s_ord_item = l_t_deliveries_keys-s_ord_item.

INSERT LINES OF l_t_deliveries INTO TABLE g_st_deliveries_vbeln.

[Abinathsiva]

Hi for quick response on question related to code. please use Code button in the editor...

[michael_piesche]

You leave us guessing on what the problem is and how to fix it.

• Why replace it and replace it with what?
• There are several possibilities to 'replace' it, those can be based on an SQL alone but also a solution in SQL as well as ABAP (e.g. select more and reduce in ABAP)
• Also it depends on your current ABAP version (e.g. select from l_t_deliveries and join with l_tabname)

[RaymondGiuseppi]

I hope you have checked that the internal table used in the FOR ALL ENTRIES clause is not empty.

Do you have the possibility to either

• Replace the FOR ALL ENTRIES with a JOIN or a SUBQUERY with the query that previously extracted the list of delivery numbers (Enhance the DataSource extractor?)
• Split the list of items into smaller packages and either execute them in sequence (better use of memory) or in parallel (Select data in a RFC FM called DESTINATION 'NONE').
• Check with basis for performance of FOR ALL ENTRIES (use of hints in emergency situations) such as system parameters : rsdb/max_blocking_factor, rsdb/max_in_blocking_factor, rsdb/prefer_join, rsdb/prefer_union_all.
• If this is a transformation rule, define the required fields as attributes of some delivery item InfoObject and don't map those at loading.

[FredericGirod]

How did you populatethe table l_t_deliveries_key ?