2012 Jun 26 4:47 PM
Hi all,
We are getting the error message "Gl/L account item without tax code in document $1 with deferred taxes"
but just in PRD, in QAS all is working fine. We tried to implement the SAP NOTE 1058620,
but it cannot be implemented throught SNOTE transaction. Do you think is a good idea to implement the
code of the corrections directly? or do you know how can we solve the issue?
Thanks in advance.
2012 Jun 26 4:55 PM
Why can you not implement the note using SNOTE. What message do you get.
And what version of R/3 are you on?
Rob
2012 Jun 26 4:55 PM
Why can you not implement the note using SNOTE. What message do you get.
And what version of R/3 are you on?
Rob
2012 Jun 26 5:17 PM
I don't know what was the message showed,
the BASIS team just said it couldn't be implemented.
The version is SAP ECC 6.0.
2012 Jun 26 5:22 PM
Well, you have to find out what the problem was. It could be that it is already implemented, in which case, you don't want to implement it. Or it may be that because there are manual steps SNOTE cannot implement it. In that case, it has to be done manually.
Rob
2012 Jun 26 5:24 PM
Having said that, if you are above support pack 10, then it should already be implemented.
Rob
2012 Jun 26 5:24 PM
Hi,
I think that the NOTE doesnt have to be implemented, because in QAS is working fine...I guess that you wont have different updates in QAS and PRD...
It must be sth about the tax account...check with a FI consultant.
Regards
2012 Jun 26 5:32 PM
Yes - check the support pack level in both systems. QA may be at a higher level.
Rob
2012 Jun 26 6:13 PM
I checked both systems and have the same level in all components.
Here it is the list:
| Software Component | Release | Level | Highest support package | Short description of software component |
| SAP_ABA | 700 | 15 | SAPKA70015 | Cross-Application Component |
| SAP_BASIS | 700 | 15 | SAPKB70015 | SAP Basis Component |
| ST-PI | 2005_1_700 | 5 | SAPKITLQI5 | SAP Solution Tools Plug-In |
| PI_BASIS | 2005_1_700 | 15 | SAPKIPYJ7F | PI_BASIS 2005_1_700 |
| SAP_BW | 700 | 17 | SAPKW70017 | SAP NetWeaver BI 7.0 |
| SAP_AP | 700 | 12 | SAPKNA7012 | SAP Application Platform |
| SAP_HR | 600 | 28 | SAPKE60028 | Human Resources |
| SAP_APPL | 603 | 2 | SAPKH60302 | Logistics and Accounting |
| EA-IPPE | 400 | 13 | SAPKGPID13 | SAP iPPE |
| EA-APPL | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INEAAPPL | SAP Enterprise Extension PLM, SCM, Finan |
| EA-DFPS | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INEADFPS | SAP Enterprise Extension Defense Forces |
| EA-FINSERV | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INEAFINSRV | SAP Enterprise Extension Financial Servi |
| EA-GLTRADE | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INEAGLTRAD | SAP Enterprise Extension Global Trade |
| EA-HR | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INEAHR | SAP Enterprise Extension HR |
| EA-PS | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INEAPS | SAP Enterprise Extension Public Services |
| EA-RETAIL | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INEARETAIL | SAP Enterprise Extension Retail |
| FINBASIS | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INFINBASIS | FINBASIS 603 |
| ECC-DIMP | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INECCDIMP | DIMP |
| ERECRUIT | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INERECRUIT | ERECRUIT 603 |
| FI-CA | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INFICA | FI-CA |
| FI-CAX | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INFICAX | FI-CA Extended |
| INSURANCE | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302ININSURANC | SAP Insurance |
| IS-CWM | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INISCWM | Industry Solution Catch Weight Managemen |
| IS-H | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INISH | SAP Healthcare |
| IS-M | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INISM | SAP MEDIA |
| IS-OIL | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INISOIL | IS-OIL |
| IS-PS-CA | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INISPSCA | IS-PUBLIC SECTOR CONTRACT ACCOUNTING |
| IS-UT | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INISUT | SAP Utilities/Telecommunication |
| LSOFE | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INLSOFE | LSOFE |
| SEM-BW | 603 | 2 | SAPK-60302INSEMBW | SEM-BW 603 |
| BP-INSTASS | 600V4 | 0 | - | Best Practices Installation Assistant ba |
| BP-ERP05 | 603V2 | 0 | - | Best Practices for All-in-One based on E |
| BP-ERP05 | 603V2 | 0 | - | Best Practices for All-in-One based on E |
So the level is 15, right? I look at the code and the modifications have not been applied.
2012 Jun 26 6:24 PM
Well, you appear to above that support level, so you cannot implement anything that has already been implemented. It may be time to raise an OSS message.
Rob