Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Developer Key activation date

Former Member
0 Likes
645

Hi,

Is there any way to find out when the developer key was activated in the system? table DEVACCESS doesn't give the date on which it was applied.

Thanks in advance.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
564

Hi,

I'm unsure of the table where it is stored, but if you have access to create the Developer Key (or if you can speak with the person at your site that does), all you have to do is try and re-create the developer key and you will receive a message giving the access key and saying something along the lines of "was already created on MM/DD/YYYY". I know it's not a table, but it is a method to derive the date you are looking for.

Hope this helps!

Mark

3 REPLIES 3
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
565

Hi,

I'm unsure of the table where it is stored, but if you have access to create the Developer Key (or if you can speak with the person at your site that does), all you have to do is try and re-create the developer key and you will receive a message giving the access key and saying something along the lines of "was already created on MM/DD/YYYY". I know it's not a table, but it is a method to derive the date you are looking for.

Hope this helps!

Mark

Read only

0 Likes
564

Thanks for the reply Mark.

We tried this already, but we couldn't make sure that the key was applied on same date when it was generated in SAP Marketplace.

So i wanted to know if there is a way to track when this was applied in the system.

Read only

Tamas_Hoznek
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Likes
564

I don't think it is possible to determine this. The table DEVACCESS does not have the 'Log data changes' flag set, so you'd have to set that to know who and when changed the table - but that'd be a modification. And even then, this would not be retroactive of course.