Creating relationship between org unit and position

[Former Member]

Hi Gurus,

i was tasked with the request to create a relation between org unit and position. i have tried the bapi RH_RELATION_MAINTAIN

to create the relationship. but it comes with the error that: Object 01 0 10003839 does not exist. below is how i used the bapi:

data:lc_plvar type plvar value '01',

lc_postype type otype value 'S',

lc_stat type ISTAT_D value '1',

lc_endda type datum value '99991231',

lc_histo type histo,

lc_short type p1000-short,

lc_stext type p1000-stext.

*..aproover define.

data: lc_sclas type p1001-sclas value 'S', "Type of related Object

plans type plans,

sobid type p1001-sobid.

select single * from t777e

where clas1 = 'O'

and relat = relats

and clas2 = 'S'

and rsign = codes.

if sy-subrc = 0.

*..set the org unit..

move 'O' to parent_pos-otype.

CALL FUNCTION 'RH_RELATION_MAINTAIN'

EXPORTING

ACT_FCODE = 'INSE'

ACT_PLVAR = parent_pos-plvar

ACT_OTYPE = parent_pos-otype

ACT_OBJID = other_pos

ACT_ISTAT = parent_pos-istat

ACT_RSIGN = codes

ACT_RELAT = relats

ACT_SCLAS = lc_sclas

ACT_SOBID = cord_pos

ACT_BEGDA = sy-datum

ACT_ENDDA = lc_endda

EXCEPTIONS

MAINTAINANCE_FAILED = 1

OTHERS = 2.

endif.

can you guys tell me what i may be doing wrong? or is something i need to do before i can the bapi? please help....

Thanks in advance

Themba

[Former Member]

Hi Gurus,

i was tasked with the request to create a relation between org unit and position. i have tried the bapi RH_RELATION_MAINTAIN

to create the relationship. but it comes with the error that: Object 01 0 10003839 does not exist. below is how i used the bapi:

data:lc_plvar type plvar value '01',

lc_postype type otype value 'S',

lc_stat type ISTAT_D value '1',

lc_endda type datum value '99991231',

lc_histo type histo,

lc_short type p1000-short,

lc_stext type p1000-stext.

*..aproover define.

data: lc_sclas type p1001-sclas value 'S', "Type of related Object

plans type plans,

sobid type p1001-sobid.

select single * from t777e

where clas1 = 'O'

and relat = relats

and clas2 = 'S'

and rsign = codes.

if sy-subrc = 0.

*..set the org unit..

move 'O' to parent_pos-otype.

CALL FUNCTION 'RH_RELATION_MAINTAIN'

EXPORTING

ACT_FCODE = 'INSE'

ACT_PLVAR = parent_pos-plvar

ACT_OTYPE = parent_pos-otype

ACT_OBJID = other_pos

ACT_ISTAT = parent_pos-istat

ACT_RSIGN = codes

ACT_RELAT = relats

ACT_SCLAS = lc_sclas

ACT_SOBID = cord_pos

ACT_BEGDA = sy-datum

ACT_ENDDA = lc_endda

EXCEPTIONS

MAINTAINANCE_FAILED = 1

OTHERS = 2.

endif.

can you guys tell me what i may be doing wrong? or is something i need to do before i can the bapi? please help....

Thanks in advance

Themba

[mvoros]

Hi,

first, RH_RELATION_MAINTAIN is not BAPI. Anyway, it looks like you get that message after call of FM RH_READ_OBJECT. 01 is plan version, 0 is object type and 10003839 is object key. Just try to debug this FM to see where you are getting an error. It looks like an issue with your data.

Cheers

[Former Member]

Hi,

Please try.

  DATA: lt_hrp1001 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF P1001.

  DATA: lw_hrp1001        TYPE p1001.

  lw_hrp1001-mandt = sy-mandt.
  lw_hrp1001-plvar = parent_pos-plvar.
  lw_hrp1001-otype = parent_pos-otype.
  lw_hrp1001-objid = other_pos.
  lw_hrp1001-istat = parent_pos-istat.
  lw_hrp1001-begda = sy-datum.
  lw_hrp1001-endda = lc_endda.

  lw_hrp1001-infty = '1001'.
  lw_hrp1001-aedtm = sy-datum.
  lw_hrp1001-uname = sy-uname.
  lw_hrp1001-rsign = codes.
  lw_hrp1001-relat = relats.
  lw_hrp1001-sclas = lc_sclas.
  lw_hrp1001-sobid = cord_pos.
  append lw_hrp1001 to lt_hrp1001.


      CALL FUNCTION 'RH_INSERT_INFTY'
        EXPORTING
          fcode               = 'INSE'
          vtask               = 'S'
          commit_flg          = 'X'
        TABLES
          innnn               = lt_hrp1001
        EXCEPTIONS
          no_authorization    = 1
          error_during_insert = 2
          repid_form_initial  = 3
          corr_exit           = 4
          begda_greater_endda = 5
          OTHERS              = 6.

Hope this helps.

regards,

Xiang Li

[Former Member]

Thanks actually both of the response they are correct. Thanks for the effort. i will locate points accordingly.