Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

BDC session method

former_member182337
Participant
0 Likes
714

Hi friends,

This may be one of the silliest question but i just couldn't get a solution .

Is it possible for me to have fields like material, plant etc in selection screen for a bdc session mehtod. As per the posts, i need to define a selection screen containig the file name and based on the file and its data the bdc program for sesion will work but is there any way to define material,plant etc as well coz my requirement is to check if the material and the plant exist and if so then go ahead and create the bdc session.

Please help.

Thanks,

Prem

5 REPLIES 5
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
688

Dear Prem,

it is not silly.... but sure is unusual.

;o)

If I understood you correctly, all you need to do is create a selection-screen with those fields.

And then, before uploading the file to be used on the BTCI sessions, your ABAP code will need to make the necessary validations prior to that.

What exactly you need to know ?

Kind Regards

/Ricardo Quintas

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
688

yes, you can display material and plant fields with selection-screen.

Read only

madhu_vadlamani
Active Contributor
0 Likes
688

Hi Prem,

You can keep selection as you need.Please post the issue clearly step by step then it is easy to answer.

Regards,

Madhu.

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
688

Hi,

You can surely keep material no. and plant in the selection screen, and based on the selection screen value you can validate the data and after the validation update the internal table with material no. and plant value and process the BDC session.

Regards.

Saptarshi Sarkar.

Read only

0 Likes
688

Thanks all. I am able to do it with selection screen. I was confused if that was possible. Thanks .