Hello Experts,
Is anyone familiar with how the related party field is derived or populated on the import entry declaration? This is the 7501-06 (weekly FTZ import entry summary) and not the standard 7501-01 (import entry), so I'm not sure if that ...
Hi Experts,
We are looking for an option to delete a Customs Invoice from GTS. Most of the transactions sit in /SAPSLL/CUHD table and there is an option to delete those. However, the Customs Invoice sits in table /SAPSLL/CIHD.
We have invoices a...
Hello! I'm wondering if anyone has created a program to automatically determine Manufacturer ID? Did you find a home for MID in ECC and update BADI transfer of vendor data to pass to GTS to land in Business Partner SLLMID field? Or did you create a p...
Hello,
We have been successfully sending the US 9 digit EIN to Customs for AES filing where the 00 suffix automatically gets assigned by CBP to make it 11 digits. However, our trade compliance team have said the 00 is no longer acceptable and that ...
We have the Commodity Retransfer program to transfer HS code from GTS to ECC MARC-STAWN field for several country regulations. When a material later gets extended to a new plant, the newly extended MARC-STAWN field never gets updated as there is no t...
Is the Goods Supplier (WL) Partner function an option? You could put partner function on the PO and inbound delivery. The LF vendor would still be US. In GTS, you can use some default rules that map the WL or the LF (sequencing) to be the Importer. N...
I suggest you create a Z table with the sales org/cocode combinations and field to mark X for the ones you want to make relevant for transfer. Then update your SD0C IFEX CTRL BADI with a line of code to read that table. If it finds the combination in...
Happy New Year! Thank you. I think I am going to have to pursue the BADI option. I do have logic already at the partner level to identify Related Party and it works great for export declarations to populate the Affiliation indicator. But for the 7501...
Happy New Year! That is where I was hoping/assumed it would be, but discovered it doesn't exist on entry summary. In hindsight, it makes sense, since this import declaration is a summary with multiple imports on it, therefore CBP wants it at t he it...
