We recently upgraded from 4.6C to 700 (or 2004s).
RSWWDHEX is running differently than it did before and I'm trying to understand if it is a problem or not.
It used to be that the jobs ran for no more than a few seconds - max 2 minutes and that was extremely rare.
Now sometimes it runs for an hour.
And it is printing out messages in the job log.
These messages appear to be something in our workflows.
Has something changed in the way it runs in 700?
And if so - should we write our workflows differently?
I had thought at first I was running the wrong job and posted another thread about it.
But we are running the correct one - and I am just concerned about how long it is taking to run now as opposed to how long it took before our upgrade.
Thanks for your help.
Scott Overmeyer
Request clarification before answering.
08/03/2007 00:05:55 Job started
08/03/2007 00:05:55 Step 001 started (program RSWWDHEX,
08/03/2007 00:06:29 Move-in document 3029985 created
08/03/2007 00:07:34 Move-in document 3029986 created
08/03/2007 00:08:23 Move-in document 3029987 created
08/03/2007 00:09:32 Move-in document 3029988 created
08/03/2007 00:09:56 Move-in document 3029989 created
08/03/2007 00:10:25 Move-in document 3029990 created
08/02/2007 22:02:11 Job started 00 516
08/02/2007 22:02:11 Step 001 started (program RSWWDHEX, variant &0000000000007, user ID WF-BATCH) 00 550
08/02/2007 22:02:24 Charge doc(s) 14353858510 posted >3 311
08/02/2007 22:02:32 Recommended deposit amount is $ 150.00 ZWORKFLOW 002
08/02/2007 22:02:51 Charge doc(s) 14353858511 posted >3 311
08/02/2007 22:03:00 Recommended deposit amount is $ 110.00 ZWORKFLOW 002
08/02/2007 22:03:04 '3' entries have been edited WL 010
08/02/2007 22:03:04 Job finished 00 517
The ZWORKFLOW id is our own custom message class.
It looks to me like this are messages from the task that is being executed when the deadline is reached.
Thanks for your help.
Scott
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Please provide a sample (a few, not a few hundred) of the messages you see in the log. Perhaps someone here will recognize them?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 10 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.