Difference between IDOC & RFC

[Former Member]

1. Can someone explain the difference between IDOC & RFC

2. from processing point of view which one would be the best performance

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Refer the below links:

[http://searchsap.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid21_gci824860,00.html|http://searchsap.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid21_gci824860,00.html]

[|]

[Choose the Right Adapter to integrate with SAP systems|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/2162] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken];

[|]

Regards

Bhanu

Intelligroup.

Edited by: Bhanu Tiruveedula on May 13, 2008 8:14 PM

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

IDOC BAPI

IDocs are text encoded documents with a rigid structure that are used to exchange data between R/3 and a foreign system.

BAPIs are a subset of the RFC-enabled function modules, especially designed as Application Programming Interface (API) to the SAP business object, or in other words: are function modules officially released by SAP to be called from external programs.

Idocs are processed asynchronously and no information whatsoever is returned to the client,

BAPIs are called synchronously and (usually) return information

The target system need not be always online. The IDOC would be created and would send the IDOC once the target system is available (tRFC concept). Hence supports guaranteed delivery

whereas for BAPIs the client code needs to do the appropriate error handling.

With asynchronous links the sub-process on the client can be finished even if the communication line or the server is not available. In this case the message is stored in the database and the communication can be done later

Problems with synchronous links occur if the communication line or the server is temporarily not available. If this happens, the sub-process on the client cannot be finished (otherwise there would be data inconsistencies).

The disadvantage of asynchronous links is that the sub-process on the server cannot return information to the calling sub-process on the client. A special way for sending information back to the client is required. In addition, a special error handling mechanism is required to handle errors on the receiving side.

Synchronous links have the advantage that the sub-process on the server can return values to the sub-process on the client that has started the link.

IDOCs may

be more changeable from release to release.

BAPIs are not totally immune to upgrades

IDOCs are poorly documented

BAPIs are reasonably well documented.