ControlM vs Redwood Central processing scheduler

[#1]

Does any one using ControlM or Redwood Central processing scheduler for job scheduling.

We are looking for the difference between these two tools.

Let me know ASAP

[Former Member]

Hi Vijay,

have got one good document from Gartner on comparison between different external schedulers. Please let me know your mail Id and I will send the same.

Best regards,

Vithalprasad

[Former Member]

Vithal

Send it to me [email protected]

Vijay

[Former Member]

Hi Vithal,

Can you send me the gartner document on job schedulers. My email id is [email protected]. Thanks a lot.

Regards

Anbu

[Former Member]

Gartner has retired the report for workload automation in 2013, you 'll end up getting older report.

I have sent you the 2012 report via email.

If there is a provision here, I could have attached in this thread to make it available for others.

[Former Member]

Thanks Vijay for the quick response. Just wanted to check whether you sent it to my gmail because i did not receive it yet for some reason.

[Former Member]

Hi Vijay,

the main difference is that the Control-M scheduler is an external scheduler which can only connect to official, external interfaces. SAP CPS, as the new standard tool of SAP, is also used SAP internally, resulting in an increasing number of SAP Applications which implicitly start using SAP CPS. Examples of such applications are SAP Closing Cockpit, SAP BI and SAP Solution Manager.

Edwin

[Former Member]

The question has been asked in other forum. Has been answered there.