cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

BPM Parallel Process with Exclusive Gateway

05-07-2011 3:43 AM
872 views 5 comments Go to solution
0 Likes
SAP Managed Tags
Subscribe

Hi,

I am facing issue with Exclusive Gateway in Parallel Process.

Issu is, process always in In-Progress state at parallel Join. I mean process stops at Parallel Join and more over there are no errors in the process. If I delete Exclusive Gateway in Parallel process, the process is going to next level human task through Parallel Join. It means working fine.

I have designed my process in such a way that, 1st task is Human Task ---> then Parallel Split with 2 Human tasks, out of one task performing throught Excusive Gateway and another one is just simple approval. Finally I am merging these two Human tasks using Parallel Join then finally triggerting Approval Human task, and closing the Process.

Appreciate your quick suggestions to fix this issue.

Thanks in advance,

Dev...

0 Likes

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Likes

HI Devara,

On parallel split the process flow divides into different parts. If you have given a parallel join at the end it waits for all the part to reach/join and then moves ahead of parallel join. In your case i guess one part is getting stuck at the Exclusive Gateway. Check the condition you have given. I think its errors out there.

Regards,

Unni

Former Member
0 Likes

Hi Unni,

Thanks for your reply.

I have checked all the parallel tasks and all are in completed state. No errors.

If I delete Exclusive Gateway it is working fine. I have checked step by step tasks in NWA, and every thing goes well.

Please let me know If I missout anything.

Thanks in advance,

Dev

Former Member
0 Likes

Hi Dev,

After the parallel split you said you are using Exclusive choice. Did you make sure that you merged the outcoming branches from Exclusive choice with an uncontrolled merge before the parallel join? If there are 3 incoming edges to the parrallel join then the token will wait at parallel join until 3 of them will come which will never happen in your case. Maybe this helps.

Regards,

Rohit

Former Member
0 Likes

Hi Rohit,

Issue got resolved.

Thank you.

Dev

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Likes

This message was moderated.