Mvt Type Fields Selection

[#1]

Hello Forum Members

I have a situation when I run report RM07CUFA for G/L account FSG and Mvt type field comparison. I get an error message mentioning following two fields are optional in mvt type and suppressed in G/L account FSG

1. EC Tax data

2. Own Bank

I do not want to make any changes to G/L account FSG. So, When I go to edit fields status group that comes through a mvt type (OMJJ) the surprisingly I do not see above fields in any were.

I would like to know from you is there a way we could edit the fields those aren't displayed in OMJJ but are shown under mvt type category during report comparison.

Nishant

[former_member183424 · Accepted solution]

You can't select these fields from MM side. After running this report, you can see the text "No MM group assigned"

That does mean, you can't make field selection for these field from MM side, you have to make it from FI side only.

[Former Member]

Thank! you for your replies. I have got confidence to my conclusion that we can not change both the field status from MM side.

But, unfortunately situation in my case is both the fields in mvt type show "optional" it is a surprise for me how it is optional under Mvt type column. Due to this reason I am unable to proceed. Every time I get an error message while posting ( FSG not matching).

This is a customized movement type

[former_member183424]

You said you are using custom movement type. Your custom movement type has been created with regards to a standard movement type (you can find it from table T156 - BUSTR). Can you please check the same for this movement type.

[Former Member]

Thanks!

It is another custom movment type and now it does not exist is any of the system Dev, Qty or Prod

[former_member183424]

What did you see in table T156 - BUSTR ?

This field should have the standard movement type (Even though you create a custom movement type copied from another custom movement type).

My doubt is, your organization has made this field as optional (from MM side) by using different method. I've checked in my system for some movement types, I am not able to see this field as optional (you can see my previous screen shot). So, if I know this movement type (which you have copied from), then I can confirm it.

[Former Member]

BUSTR is having another custom movement type. That means a custom moment type X was used to create a custom moment type Y and we now do not have custom moment type X in any system- it is deleted.

In short I do not have any reference moment type to use having both the fields optional

[former_member183424]

It should not be. BUSTR should have standard movement type. You can read this existing thread

Anyway, for your main issue, I doubt your organization has made these fields as optional by using some custom development as it is quite not possible to do that from any standard settings.

[Former Member]

[former_member183424]

That does mean your company has created an entry in table MIGO_T156.

By the way, why can't you able to make these field as optional for this G/L account ?

[Former Member]

That's the last option and I think will have to use that. Reluctance to change G/L FSG is because it is adopted as a global template and any change would impact somewhere else in the world.

Anyway I think I have to live with what is created in the past.

Thank you for your replies. I am marking on this discussion as closed

[former_member197616]

Hi, You are not supposed to change the fields through OMMJJ . In the immediate screen when you run the report RM07CUFA ,  system will allow to change . At the same time the EC TAX DATA , and BANK data are the entries of GL account for which MM moment type will not have the data . Hence you see the A/C line and click on the area of A/C of the EC TAX DATA and then will lead to the another screen the pictures are given Please change accordingly .

[Prasoon]

Hi,

   The mentioned fields are FI specific and there is no relation with movement type / MM. So you can not find these field in movement type field selection. You can proceed without these fields too. Test the same and revrt back if you are getting any error.

Regards,

AKPT

Message was edited by: PRASOON AK