Output/Print Problem through MB90?

[Former Member]

Dear Expertise,

I have developed a report in which I am calling my smartform .

It is working fine .

Now, my requirement is I have to do FORM Routine through Nace.

MB90 is the T-code through which smartform print is coming after giving input Output type and material document number.

I have configured my program name and smartform name in NACE t-code in output type WE01, WE02,WE03.

But How to code my code in standard routine i.e WE01.

I have attached pics also of MB90 t-code and nace as well.

Please give your valuable suggestions...

Waiting for your positive answers.

Thanks

Karan

[karthikeyan_p3]

Hi Karan,

It is advisable to copy WE01 and create a new output type ZWE1 to avoid confusion.

You would need a recreate the program ZMM_RGP and create a Form routine with name 'ENTRY_WE01'. In that you will have to write the logic to call the smartform.

You can refer the program RLB_INVOICE for your development.

Thanks,

Karthikeyan

[Former Member]

Hello karthikeyan,

Can you please elaborate for me as I am little confused .

What I have done so far is

I standard output type , WE01, I have copied my source code in which smartform is also called .

But , when executing mb90, selecting WE01 as output type and giving material doc no , it is giving error as -

No messages for repeat processing exist

Please help.

karan

[karthikeyan_p3]

Hi Karan,

Please go through the below link to understand the output message determination.

Message determination in Purchasing - ERP SCM - SCN Wiki

I can see that you have replaced SAPM07DR as ZMM_RGP for WE01 output type in NACE. In the earlier post, I meant, you could create a new output type say ZWE1 by copying WE01 and maintain the custom program which you have created.

As per the error message, Output is not determined for your document. I suggest you to check if the output type, condition table & condition records are correctly maintained.

Thanks,

Karthikeyan

[Former Member]

Thanks for the info .

I have resolved at my own .

Thanks once again .

Karan