Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

which is not a valid type definition

Former Member
0 Likes
511

which r not a valid type definition?

a)types : t_mytab type ifa 1 of standard table

b)types : t_mytab like ifa1

c)type : t_mytab type ifa1

d)types : t_mytab type ifa1

which r not a valid type definition?

a)types : t_mytab type ifa 1 of standard table

b)types : t_mytab like ifa1

c)type : t_mytab type ifa1

d)types : t_mytab type ifa1

1 REPLY 1
Read only

RichHeilman
Developer Advocate
Developer Advocate
0 Likes
353

1 and 3 are both not valid, we are assuming that the ifa1 is a valid table, which it is not. I think you mean LFA1. In order to make 1 and 3 correct see below.

types : t_mytab1 type  standard table of lfa1.

types : t_mytab3 type lfa1.

Regards,

Rich Heilman