The FB60 transaction has a substitucion assigned, which verifies accounts
to prevent that not allowed accounting operations can be registered.
This verification is executed using this code
if w_ica ne space.
select * from zctas_reten appending table
ti_ctasreten
where ktopl = w_ktopl
and cta_pasiva = w_hkont
and qsskz = w_ica.
endif.
loop at bool_data-bseg into bseg
where hkont(1) = '5'
or hkont(1) = '6'.
read table ti_ctasreten
with key cta_activa = bseg-hkont.
if sy-subrc ne 0.
message e802(fi) with 'Cta de gasto invalida' bseg-hkont
'para Retenciones de Renta ó ICA'.
endif.
endloop.
If the search within the table TI_CTASRETEN did not succed, it is not
possible to register the accounting movement and an error message is
generated, this works for the FB60 transaction.
The problem we have is described below:
When the MIRO transaction (MM module) is executed, a bill document is
generated (MM) also an accountant document (FI). We require that at the
moment of the accountant document generation, the system executes the same
validation that the FB60 transaction executes (explianed above). This
can't be realized using the substitution function (as used for the FB60
transaction), because de MM module does not allow Substitutions or
Validations.
How this validation can be implemented for the MIRO transaction?
Thanks in advance for your collaboration,
Bluesky
