user exit

[Former Member]

Hi,

Can anyone tell me how I can prevent users to change field MEPO1211-NETPR(Net Price) in transaction ME21N, so that the price obtained is not manually changed but comes from the info record. ...

Thanks in advance,

Veeru

[christian_wohlfahrt]

Hi Veeru!

Normally with field net price the gross price (PB00 / PBXX) can be changed in a PO (yes, sounds strange).

In customizing of conditions / purchase price schema it's possible to adjust the order: first manual entry, then automatic entry PB00 (from inforecord).

Result: if PB00 is found, PBXX is ignored.

Or the other way around: add a requirement 5 or 6 to PBXX and save condition PB00 with an exclusion flag (KZNEP).

Regards,

Christian

[Former Member]

Hi,

I think you can do it in customizing, see transaction OMF4..

Select <b>ME21N details</b>, and then <b>Quantity and Price</b> and then mark "Display" checkbox for <b>Price and price unit</b>.

Hope this helps..

Sri

Message was edited by: Srikanth Pinnamaneni

[Former Member]

Hi Veeru,

A couple of options i am thinking is...

1. You might have in IMG settings which you can change as to which fields have to be displayed, and which has to be input enabled etc.

2. you can optionally also create a transaction variant (and also make this the default one for me21n, so that whenever me21n is called the variant is executed), and in this variant you can make this field as display only.

Pls reward poinst and close the thread, if thsi solves ur problem.

Rgds,

Prabhu.

[Former Member]

Hi Prabhu,

I dont want to disable the Net price field in all the cases, i want to suppress only when account assignment category is 'p'(i.e., Production PO) and material has an info record.

If any clarrifications needed please mail me.

Thanks,

Veeru

[christian_wohlfahrt]

Hi Veeru!

I already feared, you would like to deactivate in all cases, but now it's clear.

Follow my approach, and manual changes won't have any effect, they are overwritten by result of purchase price determination. A suppress of changes is not necessary.

Regards,

Christian