transport request problem with an include prog ... not working

[Former Member]

Hello people I am in a predicament here. I have this SAP Enhancment program with a screen and include code

<b>screen:

SAPLITO01080_XUSR1080_SAPLXTOB1000

include:

ZXTOBI01</b>

right now it can be found either in the function grp XTOB or a project made by us (can be found in CMOD).

When I released the Transport Request with both of the above included. The screen SAPLITO01080_XUSR1080_SAPLXTOB1000 was sent to the prd server but the include code ZXTOBI01 didnt. I tried saving and creating a transport while editing it in XTOB and my project (ZPMTECH), and it still wont work. If any of you can give me some help regaring this I would be ever greatful. Thanks guys and take care.

[Former Member]

Hello people I am in a predicament here. I have this SAP Enhancment program with a screen and include code

<b>screen:

SAPLITO01080_XUSR1080_SAPLXTOB1000

include:

ZXTOBI01</b>

right now it can be found either in the function grp XTOB or a project made by us (can be found in CMOD).

When I released the Transport Request with both of the above included. The screen SAPLITO01080_XUSR1080_SAPLXTOB1000 was sent to the prd server but the include code ZXTOBI01 didnt. I tried saving and creating a transport while editing it in XTOB and my project (ZPMTECH), and it still wont work. If any of you can give me some help regaring this I would be ever greatful. Thanks guys and take care.

[Former Member]

Hi

Have you assign a developlument class (package) to your include?

Max

[Former Member]

[quote]

Hi

Have you assign a developlument class (package) to your include?

Max

[/quote]

yes I have it think its called ZSM_ENHANCMENTS

[RichHeilman]

And this package has a transport layer tied to it, correct.

Go in to the include, and add a blank line to the code, save and activate, it should ask for another transport request. Create one, release it, transport it. Is your include there now?

Regards,

Rich Heilman

[Former Member]

HI chad,

1. The problem it seems is

that the Include ZXTOBI01

has not been transported.

2. Create a separate request, and transport it.

regards,

amit m.

[Former Member]

double click on ur include

goto utilities->version management and checkout if it is included in ur transport request

[Former Member]

<b>"double click on ur include

goto utilities->version management and checkout if it is included in ur transport request"</b>

Its been included in my past transport request that was sent to PRD.

[RichHeilman]

Just checking, is the include "Active" in the source system? Is it "Active" in the target system?

Regards,

Rich Heilman

[Former Member]

<b>Just checking, is the include "Active" in the source system? Is it "Active" in the target system?</b>

Im not sure what you mean exactly but after checking utilities -> version managment in the include code the check box if its active seems to be ticked.

If you mean that if It was generated in the dev prior to transport then yes.

<b>

Also another thing came up. When I checked se38 in PRD I displayed the include program and it seems to be their. So right now the program is in prob but neither in the XTBO function or ZPMTECH SAP enchancment. Thanks.</b>

[Former Member]

Hi

Try to see the code of your user exit in PROD, it seems the statament INCLUDE ZX...... is missing.

In your request there should be only the include, not function (user-exit).

If it so you should transport that function, you can do it by SE84.

Max

[Former Member]

<b>"Try to see the code of your user exit in PROD, it seems the statament INCLUDE ZX...... is missing."</b>

This is in DEV: In the SAP Enhancments ZPMTECH, the thing is here is that my enhancment comes from a screen. So I just add modules and click on the module and created an enhancment. the include code cannot be seen in ZPMTECH but it can be seen in the function XTOB. However in PRD XTOB does not have the include program nor the modules, but has the screen.

<b>"In your request there should be only the include, not function (user-exit)."</b>

That is how I have transporting it, still doesnt work unfortunatley.

Thanks.