Community
Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Transaction --SM01

Go to solution
former_member582227
Explorer

‎2007 Nov 07 8:07 PM

0 Likes
1,137

Hi All

SM01...... can you lock certain transaction e.g SU01/SE11 for some specific users or role

Thanks...

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Read only

Go to solution
Former Member

‎2007 Nov 07 8:18 PM

0 Likes
977

SM01 is client independent and you should not use it to lock SU01/SE11.Instead you should not assign roles with these transactions.

Hi All

SM01...... can you lock certain transaction e.g SU01/SE11 for some specific users or role

Thanks...

Reply
3 REPLIES 3
Read only

Go to solution
Former Member

‎2007 Nov 07 8:18 PM

0 Likes
978

SM01 is client independent and you should not use it to lock SU01/SE11.Instead you should not assign roles with these transactions.

Read only

Go to solution
Former Member
In response to Former Member

‎2007 Nov 07 8:29 PM

0 Likes
977

I did not always think this way, and certainly there are exceptions to "lock things" at times, but I do agree with Mohammed... locking transactions is should not be used to protect functionality. You should use authorizations to use the functionality... to protect it or grant access to it.

Cheers,

Julius

Read only

Go to solution
Former Member

‎2007 Dec 03 12:19 PM

0 Likes
977

Its the best procedure to asign/revoke the access of the specific T-Codes for a particular user. Locking the tcodes in SM01 lock it for entire client, and affect all the users.