Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

SM35: Batch mass processing

Former Member
0 Likes
1,053

Hello Gurus,

I have more than 8000 Batch input to process because of the warning message #00349 saying that "Field &1&2 does not exist in the screen &3 &4" (these are batch input for transaction FB01).

when I process it in foreground and click on "Enter" at the time the message is displayed I can record the posting with no problem since this message is just a warning, it is however blocking the background processing...

I try to find a soculiton to process these batch in mass to avoide correcting each of them one by one...

I tried to use an LSMW but it is not possible for the transaction SM35...It is neither possible to deactivate the message with OBA5.

Do you have any smart solution?

Thank you in advance for your help

pascal

4 REPLIES 4
Read only

ThomasZloch
Active Contributor
0 Likes
732

Essentially your session content is incorrect, it has not been filled factoring in the various available or non available fields based on the circumstances of each line item (tax indicator, field status, coding block etc.).

Foreground processing (e.g. by parking a heavy object on the enter key, done that...) is just a nasty workaround.

The sessions should be created again with the correct content, so they can be properly processed in background. Even better would be to use program RFBIBL00 for mass FB01 postings.

Thomas

Read only

0 Likes
732

hello thomas,

It will be too difficult to suppress the Batch and create it again because I don't have the link between the input file and the batch in error...

Do you have a solution to export my batch in mass? ( the program "RSBDCDAT" only does it batch by batch...)

do you have a smart solution to change the message type temporary ?

thank you in advance for your help

pascal

Read only

0 Likes
732

why cant't you use rfbibl00 for your postings as Thomas wrote?

your actual coing for bdc with fb01 seems to be incorrect...

you must bear in mind field status for your accounts/posting codes ...

regards

Andreas

Read only

0 Likes
732

Sorry, I don't have a smart solution. If I was in this awkward situation, maybe I would write a nasty report or (e)CATT procedure that would start all those sessions one by one in mode "A" and leave that heavy object on the enter key overnight.

Thomas