Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

RUTMSJOB - correcting runtime objects without Dictionary definition

joestephens
Member
0 Likes
1,579

Running RUTMSJOB check of "comparing dictionary with runtime object with runtime object without dictionary definition" results in 1225 warnings of entries that are "not included in TADIR, Not active in the Dictionary". Examples are:

NTTB AIMTRKORR is not included in TADIR -350-

Not active in the Dictionary Nametab type form: T T, Time stamp: 04/15/2014 15:49:21

(Cleanup: Activation of NTTB AIMTRKORR Mode: D)

NTTB DDREPLIAPPLI is not included in TADIR -379-

Not active in the Dictionary Nametab type form: T T, Time stamp: 04/15/2014 15:39:51

(Cleanup: Activation of NTTB DDREPLIAPPLI Mode: D)

NTTB DDREPLIAPPLIT is not included in TADIR -380-

Not active in the Dictionary Nametab type form: T T, Time stamp: 04/15/2014 15:39:51

(Cleanup: Activation of NTTB DDREPLIAPPLIT Mode: D)

These entries are flagged as errors when executing SUM in the configuration check phase and must be resolved before continuing. In checking SQL the entries exist in table DDNTT but not DDNTF.

Can these warnings be resolved using RUTMSJOB "Correct Errors in Check" without adversely affecting the data dictionary?

The OSS message for this is 13664/2016

1 REPLY 1
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,176

We are currently analyzing the issue and we will provide you an update via incident .