Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

RFC_READ_TABLE for KONV table

Former Member
0 Likes
2,248

Hi All,

I am using the function module RFC_READ_TABLE to retrieve data in KONV table of R/3.

Unfortunately, it is giving me a sy-subrc = 7.

Is it possible to use this function module to KONV table?

Are there limitations on the query table to be used in this FM?

Regards,

Kezia

Hi All,

I am using the function module RFC_READ_TABLE to retrieve data in KONV table of R/3.

Unfortunately, it is giving me a sy-subrc = 7.

Is it possible to use this function module to KONV table?

Are there limitations on the query table to be used in this FM?

Regards,

Kezia

6 REPLIES 6
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,570

Hi:

try Function Module WCB_READ_KONV

Regards

Shashi

Read only

0 Likes
1,570

>

> Hi:

> try Function Module WCB_READ_KONV

> Regards

> Shashi

Hi Shashi,

Thanks for your reply.

But I need an RFC-enabled FM that will retrieve the PO conditions in R/3. I will be using it in SRM.

Hence, I cannot use WCB_READ_KONV FM in R/3.

I tried using RFC_READ_TABLE FM on other system and was able to execute it correctly using KONV. However, when I tried using it to another system (same version ECC 6.0), it gives me a runtime error ASSIGN_BASE_WRONG_ALIGNMENT - Error in ASSIGN assignment in program "SAPLSDTX".

Many thanks,

Kezia

Read only

0 Likes
1,570

Look at SAP note : 794193 , 765082 which tells what might be the problem ..

Read only

former_member156446
Active Contributor
0 Likes
1,570

I doubt as KONV beeing a cluster table...

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,570

Have read posts in the web encountering same problem and ended up copying and then modifying the function module.

Instead of copying this FM, I will just copy WCB_READ_KONV FM suggested by Shashi and just activate its remote-enabled function.

Thank you!

Kezia

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,570

Hi Kezia,

I faced the same problem, and after much analysis, I found the problem...

And the problem is that the structure of table in source and destination did not matched,

that is bcz it was giving the subrc 7.

In my case i cannot even make a RFC at destination.

but,

I hope this helps you..

Thanks,