2013 Apr 29 1:38 PM
Hi Gurus,
Kindly help me on how to proceed with this requirement.
Scenario:
We have a customized process through which autorolling happens from AR to AP. Bill Backs are obligations generated to collect balances due from suppliers because of the terms of vendor agreements. These obligations are called bill backs because it is billing back the vendor for rebates due. If a bill back becomes past due, they are rolled from the Vendors Accounts Receivable Account to the Vendors Accounts Payable Account and deducted from the next check which pays the vendor.
We require to have a check in place so that we cannot execute the above process when Automatic Payment run is in place, because if run simultaneously this prevented the F110 from completing normally. However it did post a credit/debit to the customer account for a net 0 affect. So customer remained in balance. This needs to be prevented so in future state no transactions will post if there is a payment run in process
Earliest response will be appreciated with more points.
Regards,
Lakshmanan.J.K
Hi Gurus,
Kindly help me on how to proceed with this requirement.
Scenario:
We have a customized process through which autorolling happens from AR to AP. Bill Backs are obligations generated to collect balances due from suppliers because of the terms of vendor agreements. These obligations are called bill backs because it is billing back the vendor for rebates due. If a bill back becomes past due, they are rolled from the Vendors Accounts Receivable Account to the Vendors Accounts Payable Account and deducted from the next check which pays the vendor.
We require to have a check in place so that we cannot execute the above process when Automatic Payment run is in place, because if run simultaneously this prevented the F110 from completing normally. However it did post a credit/debit to the customer account for a net 0 affect. So customer remained in balance. This needs to be prevented so in future state no transactions will post if there is a payment run in process
Earliest response will be appreciated with more points.
Regards,
Lakshmanan.J.K
2013 May 02 5:44 AM
If anyone worked on this scenario before, just share your views on this. It is quite urgent for us.
Moderator Message - Please read the Forum RoE.
Message was edited by: Suhas Saha
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 3 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |