‎2007 Oct 24 6:29 AM
Hi,
I have two tcodes FB02 and FBL1N, i have to remove the link between these two tcodes.How to do?
‎2007 Oct 24 7:17 AM
Hi,
What are these 2 transactions used for ?
What do you mean by link between them ?
If they are SAP standard Tcode's, then am not sure if this is possible/right to do so ?
What's your issue ?
Rgds, Chaitu
‎2007 Oct 24 7:17 AM
Hi,
What are these 2 transactions used for ?
What do you mean by link between them ?
If they are SAP standard Tcode's, then am not sure if this is possible/right to do so ?
What's your issue ?
Rgds, Chaitu
‎2007 Oct 24 9:37 AM
Hi,
First of all confirm if the access to the FB02 to FBL1N link is coming from SU24 entries i.e see if there is an S_TCODE with Check indicator Check/Maintain. Then change it to only check as you dont want S_TCODE with the FB02 coming up.if its in no check mode then change into check status.
But the above two are not the cases then the users might have some roles which is providing the access to S_TCODE with FB02,FBL1N.Verify the roles in the user master (AGR_USERS & AGR_1251) to see if there are any roles with S_TCODE with ranges or FB02 and FBL1N.
Thanks
Purnachandra
‎2007 Oct 24 10:14 AM
First of all I would recommend to explain "what is the link between two transactions".
If this becomes clear let's discuss changes in the SU24.
By the way. The authority check for S_TCODE is mandatory.
Cheers
Andreas
‎2007 Oct 24 7:36 PM
‎2007 Oct 24 7:47 PM
Do not rely on transaction FB02 to prevent reversals or changes to journal entries...
Use F_BKPF_BUK and better F_BKPF_KOA activities without caring too much about how the user navigates into or drills down to the journal entry.
That is a more sustainable control.
‎2007 Oct 24 8:18 PM
I agree with Julius, controlling at the object level will ultimately give you better control due to the way that it is possible to jump through screens to other transactions without invoking the S_TCODE check.
‎2009 Oct 13 12:22 AM