2008 Jun 25 5:05 AM
Hi guys.
we have created Maintenance view for addon table in 46C. so was Created Function group ZMXXXXX having below structure.
ZMXXXXX
-Func module
Table frame ZMXXX
TableProc ZMXXX
-Dictionary objects
-Dynpro
-Include
LSVIXXXX
LSVIXF01
LSVIXF02
LSVIXF03
LSVIXF04
Now after upgrade to ECC, we found that all above standard includes are using SADR table. not sure whether it affects our logic.
Now how to go with this problem. We need to recreate the Mainteance view in ECC or need to copy as Z-include and Modify the SADR table with ADRC.
Please confirm
thanks
Jaichan
Hi guys.
we have created Maintenance view for addon table in 46C. so was Created Function group ZMXXXXX having below structure.
ZMXXXXX
-Func module
Table frame ZMXXX
TableProc ZMXXX
-Dictionary objects
-Dynpro
-Include
LSVIXXXX
LSVIXF01
LSVIXF02
LSVIXF03
LSVIXF04
Now after upgrade to ECC, we found that all above standard includes are using SADR table. not sure whether it affects our logic.
Now how to go with this problem. We need to recreate the Mainteance view in ECC or need to copy as Z-include and Modify the SADR table with ADRC.
Please confirm
thanks
Jaichan
2008 Jun 25 5:27 AM
Hi Jaichan,
Table SADR is obsolete in ECC6,. U can use table ADRC or standard FM ADDR_GET.
Regards,
Vasuki
2008 Jun 25 5:36 AM
hi Vasuki,
Thanks for your reply.
I know that SADR is obsolete and its replacement too. But we cant change it because of Standard include.
so i want to know how to handle this maintenance view case. Appreciate the reply.
thanks
2008 Jun 25 8:07 AM
Hi Jaichan,
In such case even customer will recommend to copy the standard to zinclude and make thenecessary changes. its better u take the confirmation before u do anything with the standard.
But the best way out is to copy it to Z include.
Regards,
Vasuki
2008 Aug 19 9:13 AM
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 3 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |