Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Problem with VA02

Former Member
0 Likes
2,391

Hi, as you can see in the screenshot below, we have an error message when we try to access orders without entering an order number.

It was working previous our upgrade.

Do you have any info/solution on how to bypass this control to make VA02 work as before (without entering order n°)

Thanks !

8 REPLIES 8
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
2,358

What upgrade was performed.?

Please provide details .

Read only

0 Likes
2,358

BASIS 700 TO BASIS 750 (HANA)

Read only

0 Likes
2,358

Did you check for OSS notes on starus SAPMV45A / 102 (check if function code VA05 is type E Exit command) ?


Regards,

Raymond

Read only

0 Likes
2,358

Yes but no luck finding a fix for this issue.

Read only

0 Likes
2,358

You could raise an incident?

Read only

0 Likes
2,358

Hi

Have you checked your status GUI SAPMV45B/A02: as Raymond said, the functional code VA05 should be EXIT-COMMAND type

How is it in your case?

If it's different type, probably you should open a message to SAP

Max

Read only

0 Likes
2,358

Hi ,

I'm struggling me too against this issue on 750.. Same result. It seems a very strange behaviour.

I checked EXIT command flag set on GUI-STATUS. It's the same on Old and New system release.

I  launched debug on  VA02, and it really seems to bypass on PAI the first MODULE FUNKTION_AUSFUEHREN AT EXIT-COMMAND

like a ghost.

Other strange behaviour. If you launch the function "test" on  GUI-STATUS A02 of SAPMV45A on dynpro 102 in 750 release it launches dynpro 421. On release 700 it launches dynpro 102 correctly.

That's an absurd. I thought something wrong about MV45AFZZ exit but there's  no link.

........

Read only

0 Likes
2,358

Hi.

Pay attention . SAPMV45B is the main program

This is 750:

This is 700

Now I don't know if it's a a incident as Raymond suggest but that's it...

Hope to help

Bye