Problem with if checking

[Former Member]

I am encountering with a strange problem. I am checking for a relational operator after a 'IF' field. for eg

if a correct.

a jh b -

---

> incorrect ( because jh is not a relational operator)

My code is

if not itab-line CA '=,,<,>,<=,>=,eq,ne,lt,gt,le,ge,co,cn,ca,na,cs,ns,cp,np,between,is,in,not'.

RAISE INVALID_IF.

endif.

This code was working fine (raising exception) when I test it with special characters ( !,@,# etc ) but as soon as I tested it with characters it is passing all the test without raising exception for eg

a gth b, c ytl 100 --> it should ideally raise exception as gth,ytl are not relational operator....but still it is passing all the test.

What should I use instead of CA??

Edited by: priya singh on Jan 16, 2009 1:08 PM

[tarangini_katta]

Hi priya,

Use contanis pattren 'CP'.

it may solve u r pblm.

Thanks,

[Former Member]

Why dont you use

if not itab-line CN '=,,<,>,<=,>=,eq,ne,lt,gt,le,ge,co,cn,ca,na,cs,ns,cp,np,between,is,in,not'.

RAISE INVALID_IF.

endif.

Instead of

if not itab-line CA '=,,<,>,<=,>=,eq,ne,lt,gt,le,ge,co,cn,ca,na,cs,ns,cp,np,between,is,in,not'.

RAISE INVALID_IF.

endif.

Try it.

Regards,

Madan Mohan.

[SujeetMishra]

Hello Priya,

These !,@,# relational operator is Exception in SAP.

you can simply check this by writing a program for validation, your program will never work for these.

Infact I was searching its answer since long time but did not get any result and conclusion. if you get then please update this thread.

Have a Nice Day,

Regards,

Sujeet

[Former Member]

Hi ,

The comparison operators takes into account evn the leading and triling blank values when comparision.

Contains Any: True, if operand1 contains at least one character from operand2.

Please refer the below link and choose a suitable operator:

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/fc/eb3516358411d1829f0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm

Regards,

Radhika.

[Former Member]

CA '=,,<,>,<=,>=,eq,ne,lt,gt,le,ge,co,cn,ca,na,cs,ns,cp,np,between,is,in,not'

You're making the mistake to assume each operator in '=,,<,>,<=,>=,eq,ne,lt,gt,le,ge,co,cn,ca,na,cs,ns,cp,np,between,is,in,not' is validated, but it's not.

However, each separate character in that string is checked

So if your string would contain a single character from '=,,<,>,<=,>=,eq,ne,lt,gt,le,ge,co,cn,ca,na,cs,ns,cp,np,between,is,in,not' the check will pass your test as well.

You can test it out yourself:

data: lv_test1 type string,
      lv_test2 type string.


lv_test1 = '>>'.
lv_test2 = 'gtttt'.

if lv_test1 ca '>,gt'.
  write:/ 'contains operator'.
else.
  write:/ 'does not contain operator'.
endif.


if lv_test2 ca '>,gt'.
  write:/ 'contains operator'.
else.
  write:/ 'does not contain operator'.
endif.

So i don't think you will be able to do your check with CO CP CS and such.

A possible solution might be to create an internal table with each operator in an entry.;And then to check if you string holds one of the entries in your internal table.

Just an example:

types: begin of ty_operators,
          value type string,
       end of ty_operators,

       begin of ty_split,
         value(30) type c,
       end of ty_split.

data: gv_text1(30) type c,
      gv_text2(30) type c,
      it_operators type table of ty_operators,
      wa_operators type ty_operators,
      it_split     type table of ty_split,
      wa_split     type ty_split.


clear: it_operators[].

wa_operators-value = '='.  append wa_operators to it_operators.
wa_operators-value = '<'.  append wa_operators to it_operators.
wa_operators-value = '>'.  append wa_operators to it_operators.
wa_operators-value = '<='. append wa_operators to it_operators.
wa_operators-value = '>='. append wa_operators to it_operators.
wa_operators-value = 'eq'. append wa_operators to it_operators.
* and so on for all your operators


gv_text1 = 'IF >>bla eq blabla'.
split gv_text1 at space into table it_split.

loop at it_split into wa_split.

  read table it_operators into wa_operators with key value = wa_split-value.
  if sy-subrc eq 0.
     write: / gv_text1, 'contains operator', wa_operators-value.
  endif.

endloop.



gv_text2 = 'IF bla eqeq blabla'.
split gv_text2 at space into table it_split.

loop at it_split into wa_split.

  read table it_operators into wa_operators with key value = wa_split-value.
  if sy-subrc eq 0.
     write: / gv_text2, 'contains operator', wa_operators-value.
  endif.

endloop.

Maybe there are other solutions, but you just have to try harder to find them.

[ThomasZloch]

Try using the SYNTAX-CHECK command. I have constructed this from the ABAP online help:

DATA: itab TYPE TABLE OF string,
      mess TYPE string,
      lin  TYPE i,
      wrd  TYPE string,
      dir  TYPE trdir.

APPEND 'PROGRAM dummy.'               TO itab.
APPEND 'DATA a type c.'               TO itab.
APPEND 'DATA b type c.'               TO itab.
APPEND 'IF a GHE b.'                  TO itab.                "example, change as desired
APPEND 'ENDIF.'                       TO itab.

SYNTAX-CHECK FOR itab MESSAGE mess LINE lin WORD wrd
                 DIRECTORY ENTRY dir.

Check SY-SUBRC and the contents of "mess" to find out if your operator is supported.

Thomas

[Former Member]

Nice one!