2010 Jun 30 6:31 PM
I am using the FM BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN. This FM is a RFC. When I execute BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN, I have confirmed that the return information indicates success. When I execute the BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT, the FM terminiates witha short dump
Error analysis
A RAISE statement in the program "SAPLCOZV" raised the excepti
condition "DUMP_STATUS_INCONSYSTENCY_FRE".
Since the exception was not intercepted by a superior
program, processing was terminated.
Short description of exception condition:
For detailed documentation of the exception condition, use
Transaction SE37 (Function Library). You can take the called
function module from the display of active calls.
-
To make this even more confusing, I have a different FM (Not an RFC) that uses the same two FM's with the same data. When I run this FM, I get no error and the update is succesful.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Can you please elaborate the code you have fixed, as we have encountered similar issue.
Regards
2010 Jun 30 8:31 PM
I found the coding problem. Howver, I think SAP should fix the Transaction commit so it handles errors appropriately.
2010 Oct 05 5:54 AM
Can you please elaborate the code you have fixed, as we have encountered similar issue.
Regards
2014 Aug 25 8:38 AM
Dear Scott,
Can you please let me know the solution for this issue, i am also facing the same problem for iw21.
Thanks in Advance,
Regards,
Syed Taj
2014 Aug 25 2:39 PM
There was a problem with the order where one of the phase indicators in AUFK (PHAS0, PHAS1, PHAS2, PHAS3) and AFIH-IPHAS were not showing the same status. I believe in oru case,AUFK-PHAS0 = X(CRTD) and AFIH-IPHAS = '2' (Released)
If your problem is similar, be sure to check JEST to see what status the order is in.
We wrote a program to update AUFK=PHAS* and AFIH-IPHAS to match what was indicated in JEST.
I hope this helps you. feel free to ask more questions if needed
Scott
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 6 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |