Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Problem while issuing output for Invoice

Former Member
0 Likes
1,387

Hello Experts,

The number of copies that is given in the condition records(communication method) is 3. Now when the output is triggered, we use the option "SEnd with periodically scheduled job" in "further data".

Now when we save the document, NAST table gets updated with the output entry, with processing status as 'Not processed' and the number of copies (NAST-ANZAL) which is 3.

But when we execute it through RSNAST00, In the form entry of the driver program(SD_INVOICE_PRINT01 for adobe form), in the NAST structure we are getting value as 1.

This value(NAST-ANZAL) is coming correctly in one system that is 3, but in another system this value(NAST-ANZAL) is default 1 which is wrong.

Can you please explain why is this different behavior.

Thanks in Advance,

Febin

6 REPLIES 6
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,161

Please compare Output type settings NAST transaction & Condition records VV33 in both the systems.

Read only

0 Likes
1,161

OUTPUTTYPE settings NACE transaction

Read only

0 Likes
1,161

Output type sttings in NACE transaction and Condition records in VV33 are the same in both the system

Read only

0 Likes
1,161

We can set Number of messages in Output control screen of invoice in Communication method. Please check.

Read only

0 Likes
1,161

Eventhogh the number of message is 3 in the communication method ,only one output is triggered, that is only one original, no copies are triggered.

Read only

0 Likes
1,161

Hi Febin

Please check multiple isssuing is checked or not.

NACE Transaction --> Select Application --> Click on Output Types--> Double click on Type --> In general Data Tab --> Multiple Issuesing Checkbox.

Hope it may solve your issue.

Thanks,

Chandr