Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Problem in Inbound Processing

Former Member
0 Likes
1,851

Hi

I am using Inbound Processing using WE19.

It is showing "Partner profile not maintained". However I have maintained in WE20 & added Msg Type in Inbound Params.

After generating IDoc, in WE05 its showing status Red & showing message -

Partner profile inbound not available

Message no. E0337

Diagnosis

An inbound partner profile could not be found with the following key:

/PROCLNT100/LS//MATMAS01////

This involves the key fields of table EDP21.

I have checked in Table EDP21, entries for that Partner Profile exists.

Please help.

12 REPLIES 12
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,452

Hi Nikhil,

Just cross check once again, that you have created Partner profile type LS for logical system PROCLNT100 and the idoc type is MATMAS01 and you are getting the same idoc type in we02/We05.

Sachin

Read only

0 Likes
1,452

Thanks for replies.

@ Sachin :

In Partner Profile, in Inbound Params, i'm maintaing MATMAS as messgae type & Process Code as MATM.

But as u said, in WE05, its showing MATMAS01 as Msg Type.

Read only

0 Likes
1,452

Hi Nikhil,

What's your scenario?

In WE02 msg type should be MATMAS only and basic type should be MATMAS01 (which you are using) and partner is same under column name partner..

Also check tcode SM58 in Receiving system as well.

Sachin

Read only

0 Likes
1,452

Hi

I am just testing simple Inbound IDocs.

I have created Partner Profile in which I have added MATMAS in inbund params.

created CDM & in WE19 testing the IDocs.

There when I am clicking "Inbound Proc.", then in Box message is coming "Partner Profile not maintained".

I have to fill Sender & receiver's Info also?

Read only

0 Likes
1,452

hi nikhil..in we20 u have to fill detail of reciever i.e. your system in inbound parameters thats all..

regards

Edited by: Madan Gopal Sharma on Mar 24, 2009 1:16 PM

Read only

0 Likes
1,452

hi madan

I am filling that also.

In WE19, I am getting "Receiver port invalid" in the box where we fill sender & receiver details.

I have mentioned valid port.

(My scenario is - I am just checking wheather Inbound IDoc works or not. Creating data from WE19 in server & sending to same server only. Checking wheather MARA tables are getting filled or not).

Read only

0 Likes
1,452

Nikhil, Check your port config thru WE21, also check the RFC for this particular port if its valid and working correctly.

Check this blog it contans all the information for Basic ALE steps config:

/people/kevin.wilson2/blog/2006/11/13/ale-scenario-development-guide

Best of luck.

Shital

Read only

0 Likes
1,452

Thanks Shital.

But my prob is/was different.

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,452

Hi Nikhil,

Please check if the correct RFc is maintained in the partner Profile.

If itscorrect I suggest to delete partner profile for this message type and regenerate the Partner Profiles for this Distribution model thru BD64 menu.

Regards

Shital

Edited by: shital phadake on Mar 24, 2009 3:04 PM

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,452

dear nikhil..check we57 tcode entry for ur FM and message type

regards

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,452

Solved

Read only

0 Likes
1,452

Hello Nikhil and other Experts,

I neeeeeed your guidances. Thank you all in advance. I am explaining what I have done so far in the following!!

Scenario: 1) Same system: T05

2) Two clients: 454 and 455

3) Two logical system for sure: T05CLNT454 and T05CLNT455

4) Transfer Material Master Data from 455 to 454

Since I am a student and this system is actually for me to play around and practice, I did something crazy. I have been browsing so many forums and taking so many actions, but still I am having some issues.

What I have done:

1) Went to 'BD10' on 455 -> Tried to send material master data

2) 0 Communications generated for IDOCS

3) Googled the solutions and found out that it was due to filter setting.

4) Went to 'BD64'. Since message type for transferring Material Master is MATMAS, I went there trying to inactivate those annoying filters for message type MATMAS.

5) I could not inactivate those, so I deleted them intentionally, even though the system warned me not to delete so. The technical names of those two filters I deleted were 'MM-PUR1' and 'MM-PUR2'

6) Later, I created another filter, which was related to MATMAS, without activating it, or say without setting ANY filtering parameters.

7) I did the same things on 454. (Deleted two filters and created another one called TEST)

😎 Went back to 455 and went to 'BD10' again.

9) 50 IDOCS generated.

10) Went to 454 and used 'BD11' to received material master data. Was not able to receive any.

11) Used 'WE02' on 454, and those IDOCS were all showing error 56. (Red message)

12) Used 'WE20' to define partner profiles on both clients, 454 and 455. (I actually just did whatever I felt like to do, since this system was only for me to practice. I don't mind messing it up. Haha~~)

13) Went to 455 again and used 'BD10' to send my materials again.

14) Back to 454 and used 'WE02'. This time, some (about 8 IDOCS) were green and 42 IDOCS were yellow with message 64 (IDOC ready to be transferred to application)

15) Executed 'BD11' on 454, and there were exactly 8 materials being transferred.

16) Re-did 'BD10' on 455 and 'BD11' on 454 many times, but it seemed that there were no chances to successfully receive 50 IDOCS on 454. In other words, there were still yellow messages each time.

Some suggestions from other forums said that we could increase the number of "dialog work process". I am just wondering is that the root cause to my situation now?

Any other clues from you experts? BTW, if some of you see what I was doing was crazy, please correct me as well. For example, step 5, deleted two filters directly without a doubt. Haha~~ (Maybe you can tell me how to inactivate them?) Thank you soooooo much in advance!!

Best best regards,

Alfred