Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

PP ORDER - SUB-OPERATION - CONFIRMATION

Former Member
0 Likes
1,453

I'm looking for a manner to confirm a sub operation in ABAP...

When I go to std transaction, no input of quantity is needed. My point is how to automate the process and do it in abap ( if possible without BATCH INPUT )

I found the fm CO_RU_CONFIRMATION_ADD which does help me, but maybe i'm not giving the parameter very well for sub confirmation...

Thank you in advance

Stephan

I'm looking for a manner to confirm a sub operation in ABAP...

When I go to std transaction, no input of quantity is needed. My point is how to automate the process and do it in abap ( if possible without BATCH INPUT )

I found the fm CO_RU_CONFIRMATION_ADD which does help me, but maybe i'm not giving the parameter very well for sub confirmation...

Thank you in advance

Stephan

6 REPLIES 6
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,123

Hi Stephan,

If you use CO_RU_CONFIRMATION_ADD with suboperations you should use UVORN field of AFRUD parameter.

      • Warning *** SAP does a lot of checks before call this function. Because that, I prefer to call CO11N via batch input.

If I am right, you have to call CO_RU_CONFIRMATION_POST after CO_RU_CONFIRMATION_ADD... check include LCORUF1M...

Best regards,

Leandro Mengue

Read only

0 Likes
1,123

Leandro,

thx for the answer and the tip !

Usually I try not to do BATCH INPUT but it looks this transaction is quite complicate...

I'll ever use co11 in BI because co11n gives a problem with the text control.

Thanks anyway!

Read only

0 Likes
1,123

And you are very right !

I use POST FUNCTION MODULE to process the new confirmation!

S.

Read only

0 Likes
1,123

Hi Stephan,

I use CO11N because I disabled the text window in PP customizing...

Best regards,

Leandro Mengue

Read only

0 Likes
1,123

Would you see any reason I woudl'nt use CO11 ?

Read only

0 Likes
1,123

Hi Stephan,

I think that is ok to use CO11. Basicly is the same that CO11N.

Best regards,

Leandro Mengue