OSS Notes 997248

[Former Member]

Hi All,

I need to apply OSS notes 997248. But unfortunately I put Implementation name as the Badi definiation name G_SET_FORMULA_EXIT in se19. It is activated also. I am not sure what will be the impact ? GET_TYPE & EVALUATE methods copied from CL_EXM_IS_G_SET_FORMULA_EXIT.

After doing all these I cant see any difference in the report .

Appreciate your help.

Rehards,

Sunanda

[Former Member]

Hi All,

I need to apply OSS notes 997248. But unfortunately I put Implementation name as the Badi definiation name G_SET_FORMULA_EXIT in se19. It is activated also. I am not sure what will be the impact ? GET_TYPE & EVALUATE methods copied from CL_EXM_IS_G_SET_FORMULA_EXIT.

After doing all these I cant see any difference in the report .

Appreciate your help.

Rehards,

Sunanda

[LeonardoAraujo]

You should be able to deactivate the implementation and recreate with the right namespace.

But this should not affect its execution.

Please provide more information.

Leonardo De Araujo

[Former Member]

Leonardo,

Thank you very much for your prompt reply.

Actually forllowing Activity nee dto do adv by SAP:

&ACTIVITY&

In transaction SE19, create an implementation for the G_SET_FORMULA_EXIT BAdI definition.

Create new filter values and specify the name of the exit and give it a description.

The exit name must have four characters. You can create more than one exit with an implementation.

Implement the GET_TYPE and EVALUATE methods as shown in the sample implementation.

Activate the BAdI implementation. After this, the new exits are available for processing formula variables.

&EXAMPLE&

See sample implementation CL_EXM_IM_G_SET_FORMULA_EXIT.

While doing the above somethign happened wrong.

Cheers...