Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

ongoing development and bugfixing on same development system

Former Member
0 Likes
938

Hi ABAP guys,

Does anybody of you know, if it is possible to separate bugfixing and ongoing development somehow in a 3-system ABAP stack landscape?

The question is if there is a way to do ongoing development (e.g. for the next release) and bugfixing on the same development objects in the same dev. system without transporting the ongoing development to the next system.

In Java development it would be done by creating a separate track. Can you use versions to do that or is there any other possibility or do you need to set up a second dev. system?

Thanks and regards,

Martin

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
897

We've had to use a four system landscape for this.

Rob

6 REPLIES 6
Read only

former_member156446
Active Contributor
0 Likes
897

how about using clients? say 100 for ongoing 200 for project work... but retrofitting changes one to another is always a hassle to deal with

Read only

0 Likes
897

Development is usually client independent. Therefore I guess using a different client does not solve the problem.

Read only

0 Likes
897

That's right, the dev objects are client independent, so using clients will not help. Basically, I think there is no easy way to achieve what you want to do in one system.

Regards,

Rich Heilman

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
898

We've had to use a four system landscape for this.

Rob

Read only

faisalatsap
Active Contributor
0 Likes
897

Hi, Martin

I don't know that it is good or not for your scenario, but what if you create a copy for new release and continue bug fixing with the old one.

Sorry if not Suitable for you,

Best Regards,

Faisal

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
897

Thanks for your answers. At least I know now that it is not easily possible.