2013 Apr 29 11:51 AM
Invoice Numbers are getting skipped while executing MIRO and MIRA, We cannont deactive the Deactive Buffer for object RE_BELEG in SNRO as its will deactive buffer for all company codes.
We require this fuctionality for specific comapany codes.
2013 Apr 29 12:19 PM
Hi,
We also faced the same issue in which we are not allowed to change the SNRO for the object RE_BELE.
You can follow the following steps.
Function Module NUMBER_GET_NEXT contains IGNORE_BUFFER as an importing parameter, you just need to pass 'X', but for that you need to create an implicit enhancement in function module MRM_INVOICE_NUMBER_GENERATE.
Copy whole logic of MRM_INVOICE_NUMBER_GENERATE into an include and pass IGNORE_BUFFER as "X" to the function module NUMBER_GET_NEXT.
In such a way you can execute the NURMER_GET_NEXT with IGNORE_BUFFER EQ X for the intended company code and for rest of the company code the original logic will work.
Hope it will help.
Thanks
Anuraj
Invoice Numbers are getting skipped while executing MIRO and MIRA, We cannont deactive the Deactive Buffer for object RE_BELEG in SNRO as its will deactive buffer for all company codes.
We require this fuctionality for specific comapany codes.
2013 Apr 29 12:11 PM
Hi Kumar,
Can you try by making the NO. OF NUMBERS IN BUFFER by 0.
I am not sure whether it will work or not,but let's give it a try though.
Regards,
Santanu Mohapatra.
2013 Apr 29 12:19 PM
Hi,
We also faced the same issue in which we are not allowed to change the SNRO for the object RE_BELE.
You can follow the following steps.
Function Module NUMBER_GET_NEXT contains IGNORE_BUFFER as an importing parameter, you just need to pass 'X', but for that you need to create an implicit enhancement in function module MRM_INVOICE_NUMBER_GENERATE.
Copy whole logic of MRM_INVOICE_NUMBER_GENERATE into an include and pass IGNORE_BUFFER as "X" to the function module NUMBER_GET_NEXT.
In such a way you can execute the NURMER_GET_NEXT with IGNORE_BUFFER EQ X for the intended company code and for rest of the company code the original logic will work.
Hope it will help.
Thanks
Anuraj
2013 Apr 29 12:56 PM
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 3 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |